The New Irish Constitution: An Exposition and Some Arguments
History
The New Irish Constitution: An Exposition and Some Arguments
Home rule -- Ireland; Ireland -- Politics and government
The policy of “Unionist” leaders is to meet the Irish desire for an
uplifting pride in the life of the Irish commonwealth by a flat denial.
Ireland, we are told, is not, nor ever has been, nor ever can be, a
nation. A disorganized and contentious people, incapable of rightly using
any polity Irish or English, we have not, it is said, even the materials
of a nation. We are only “material,” to use an old Irish expression, for
an Empire. The island in fact was never a kingdom till England gave it a
king worthy the name; so how could it be a nation? To the gift of a king
England added her invention of a Parliament, but the failure of Parliament
in Ireland was open and flagrant; how then talk about a nation?
“There are Englishmen and Scotchmen,” says Mr. Balfour, “who
really suppose that England has deprived Ireland of its own
national institutions, has absorbed Ireland, which had a polity
and a civilization of its own—has absorbed it in the wider sphere
of British politics; and who think that a great wrong has thereby
been done to a separate nationality.... It is a profound illusion.
It has no basis in historical fact at all.”
He gives a history of his own.
“Those whom the Nationalists choose more particularly and
especially to call Irishmen, namely, the original inhabitants of
Ireland—those who were there before the Celt and before the Saxon
and before the Norman—never had the chance of developing, they
never could have developed, a polity of their own, any more than
the Highlanders. That does not mean that they are in any sense
inferior, but it does mean that all this talk of restoring to
Ireland Irish institutions, and of governing Ireland according to
Irish ideas, has no historic basis whatever.”
It is for such wayward imaginings that the historic claim of Ireland is
denied. What meaning shall we give to this new dogma of the partiality of
Nationalists for some pre-Celtic race—whether Iberian, or whether (as some
explain the phrase) Finn MacCumhaill and his followers, ingeniously
regarded by Mr. Balfour as having adorned Ireland before the Celtic age?
Where was the “Saxon” settlement in Ireland between the Celts and the
Normans? What is the comparison of the Highlanders with the original
inhabitants of Ireland? Why should Mr. Balfour’s doubts of a pre-Celtic
polity put an end to all talk of Irish institutions and Irish ideas?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account