The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
We are at present trying to secure (1) a more efficient government, and
(2) a real not a nominal control of government by the people. The
tendency to transfer power to the American citizenship, and the tendency
towards efficient government by the employment of experts and the
concentration of administrative authority, are working side by side in
American political life to-day. These two tendencies are not opposed,
and if the main thesis of this book has been proved, it is understood by
this time why they are not opposed. Democracy I have said is not
antithetical to aristocracy, but includes aristocracy. And it does not
include it accidentally, as it were, but aristocracy is a necessary part
of democracy. Therefore administrative responsibility and expert service
are as necessary a part of genuine democracy as popular control is a
necessary accompaniment of administrative responsibility. They are
parallel in importance. Some writers seem to think that because we are
giving so much power to our executives, we must safeguard our “liberty”
by giving at the same time ultimate authority to the people. While this
is of course so in a way, I believe a truer way of looking at the matter
is to see centralized responsibility and popular control, not one
dependent on the other, but both as part of the same thing—our new
democracy.
Both our city and our state governments are being reorganized. We have
long felt that city government should be concentrated in the hands of a
few experts. The old idea that any honest citizen was fit for most
public offices is rapidly disappearing. Over three hundred cities have
adopted the commission form of government, and there is a growing
movement for the city-manager plan. But at the same time we must have a
participant electorate. We can see three stages in our thinking: (1) our
early American democracy thought that public offices could be filled by
the average citizen; (2) our reform associations thought that the
salvation of our cities depended on expert officials; (3) present
thinking sees the necessity of combining expert service and an active
electorate.[75]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account