The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
The question staring us in the face in American politics to-day is—What
possible good can direct government do us if party organization remains
in control? The movement for direct primaries, popular choice of United
States senators, presidential primaries, initiative and referendum, the
recall etc., will bear little fruit unless something is done at the same
time to break the power of the party. Many people tell us that our
present party system, with its method of caucuses, conventions, bosses
etc., has failed, and they are now looking to the direct primary as
their hope, but the direct primary in itself will not free us from the
tyranny of party rule. Look at this much-lauded direct primary and see
what it is actually giving us: the political machines have known from
the beginning how to circumvent it, it often merely increases the power
of the boss, and at its best it is accomplishing no integrating of the
American people—the real task of democracy. No development of party
machinery or reform of party machinery is going to give us the will of
the people, only a new method.
Moreover, merely giving more power to the people does not automatically
reduce the hold of the party; some positive measures must be taken if
direct government is not to fail exactly as representative government
has failed. The faith in direct government as a sure panacea is almost
pathetic when we remember how in the past one stronghold after another
has been captured by the party. Much has been written by advocates of
direct government to show that it will destroy the arbitrary power of
the party, destroy its relation to big business, etc., but we see little
evidence of this. We all know, and we can see every year if we watch the
history of referendum votes, that the party organization is quite able
to use “direct government” for its own ends. Direct government worked by
the machine will be subject to much the same abuses as representative
government. And direct and representative government cannot be
synthesized by executive leadership alone. All that is said in favor of
the former may be true, but it can never be made operative unless we are
able to find some way of breaking the power of the machine. Direct
government can be beneficial to American politics only if accompanied by
the organization of voters in non-partisan groups for the production of
common ideas and a collective purpose. Of itself direct government can
never become the responsible government of a people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account