The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
Already the daily lives of people are passing into the area of
government through the increased social legislation of all our states
during the last few years. In 1912 a national party was organized with
social legislation as part of its platform. The introduction of social
programs into party platforms means that a powerful influence is at work
to change American politics from a machine to a living thing. When the
political questions were chiefly the tariff, the trust, the currency,
closely as these questions affected the lives of people, there was so
little general knowledge in regard to them that most of us could
contribute little to their solution. The social legislation of the last
few years has taken up crime, poverty, disease, which we all know a
great deal about: laws have been passed regarding child labor, workmen’s
compensation, occupational disease, prison reform, tuberculosis,
mothers’ pensions, the liquor question, minimum wage, employment
agencies etc.
Tammany is built up on the most intimate local work: no family, no
child, is unknown to its organization. And it is founded on the long
view: votes are not crudely bought—always; the boy is found a job, the
father is helped through his illness, the worn-out mother is sent for a
holiday to the country. As politics comes to mean state employment
bureaus, sickness and accident insurance, mothers’ pensions, Tammany is
being shorn of much of its power.
We are sometimes told, however, that while it is conceded that campaign
issues should be made up from our intimate, everyday needs, yet it is
feared that on each question a different split would come, and thus
politics would be too confusing and could not be “handled.” Neighborhood
organization is going to help us meet this difficulty. In non-partisan
neighborhood associations we shall have different alignments on every
question. Moreover, we shall have different alignments on the same
question in different years. Thus the rigidity of the party organization
disappears. The party meeting is to the neighborhood meeting what the
victrola is to the human voice: the partisan assembly utters what has
been impressed upon it, you hear the machine beating its own rhythm; the
neighborhood meeting will give the fresh ever-varied voices from the
hearts of men. The party system and the genuine group system is the
difference between machine-made and man-made. And this may be true of a
good government organization as well as of a Tammany organization—it is
true wherever the machine is put above the man. We can get no force
without freshness, and you cannot get freshness from a machine, only
from living men. Just the very thing which costs the party money—keeping
its members together—is its condemnation. Men will make up their minds
on question after question in their neighborhood groups. Then they will
vote according to these conclusions. Party dictation will never cease
until we get group conviction. If our political life is going to show
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account