The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
The usual notion is that our neighborhood association is to evolve an
idea, a plan, and then when we go to represent it at a meeting of
neighborhood associations from different parts of the city that we are
to try to push through the plan of action decided on by our own local
group. If we do not do this, we are not supposed to be loyal. But we are
certainly to do nothing of the kind. We are to try to evolve the
collective idea which shall represent the new group, that is, the
various neighborhood associations all acting together. We are told that
we must not sacrifice the interests of the particular group we
represent. No, but also we must not try to make its interests prevail
against those of others. Its real interests are the interests of the
whole.
And then when we have learned to be truly citizens of Boston, we must
discover how Boston and other cities, how cities and the rural
communities can join. And so on and so on. At last the “real” state
appears. We are pragmatists because we do not want to unite with the
state imaginatively, we want to be the state; we want to actualize and
feel our way every moment, let every group open the way for a larger
group, let every circumference become the centre of a new circumference.
My neighborhood group opens the path to the State.
But neighborhoods coöperating actively with the city government is not
to-day a dream. Marcus M. Marks, President of the Borough of Manhattan,
New York City, in 1914 divided Manhattan into sixteen neighborhoods, and
appointed for each a neighborhood commission composed of business men,
professional men, mechanics, clerks etc.—a thoroughly representative
body chosen irrespective of party lines. Mr. Marks’ avowed object was to
obtain a knowledge of the needs of his constituents, to form connecting
links between neighborhoods and the city government. And these bodies
need not exist dormant until their advice is asked. Sections 1 and 2 of
the Rules and Regulations read:
“1. The Commissions shall recommend, or suggest, to the Borough
President, for his consideration and advice, matters which, in
their opinion will be of benefit to their districts and to the
City.
“2. The Commissions shall receive from the Borough President
suggestions or recommendations for their consideration as to
matters affecting their districts, and report back their
conclusions with respect thereto.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account