The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
The part labor will take in the new state depends now largely upon labor
itself. Labor must see that it cannot reiterate its old cries, that it
need no longer demand “rights.” It is a question of a new conception of
the state and labor seeing its place within it. For a new state is
coming—we cannot be blind to the signs on every side, we cannot be deaf
to the voices within. Labor needs leaders to-day who are alive not to
the needs of labor, but to the needs of the whole state: then it will be
seen as a corollary how labor fits in, what the state needs from labor,
what labor needs from the state, what part labor is to have _in_ the
state.
-----
Footnote 136:
See pp. 199–201.
Footnote 137:
Some writers talk of trade representation vs. party organization as if
in the trade group you are rid of party. Have they studied the
politics of trade unionism? In neither the trade group nor the
neighborhood group do you automatically get rid of the party spirit.
That will be a slow growth indeed.
Footnote 138:
Yet perhaps the trade-union has been one of the truest groups, one of
the most effective teachers of genuine group lessons which we have yet
seen. Increased wages, improved conditions, are always for the group.
The trade-unionist feels group-wants; he seeks to satisfy these
through group action. Moreover the terms of a collective bargain
cannot be enforced without a certain amount of group solidarity. In
strikes workmen often sacrifice their own interests for what will
benefit the union: the individual—I may prefer his present wages to
the privations of a strike; the group-I wants to raise the wages of
the whole union.
Footnote 139:
I have not in this brief statement distinguished between government
“ownership,” “control,” “regulation,” etc. See “War-Time Control of
Industry” by Howard L. Gray.
Footnote 140:
“Representative Government in British Industry” by J. A. Hobson, in
_New Republic_, September 1, 1917.
Footnote 141:
See p. 120.
Footnote 142:
Following the precedent of England which provided, under the Munitions
of War act and other legislation, machinery (joint boards representing
employers and employed) for the prevention and adjustment of labor
disputes.
Footnote 143:
Christensen, “Politics and Crowd Morality,” p. 238.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART IV
THE DUAL ASPECT OF THE GROUP:
A UNION OF INDIVIDUALS, AN INDIVIDUAL IN A LARGER UNION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
XXXIV
THE MORAL STATE AND CREATIVE CITIZENSHIP
--------------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account