+Church only exists for the sake of the kingdom.+--But how far did
Jesus foresee and intend this? It is difficult to say, but his choice
of twelve apostles whom He carefully trained to continue His work is
evidence that He contemplated the formation of some kind of society to
give effect to His teaching. The number twelve points to the
probability that He thought of this society as a kind of new Israel, a
spiritual Israel, which should do for the world what the older Israel
had failed to do, that is, bring about the kingdom of God. I have
already pointed out that in my judgment Jesus did not believe, as His
contemporaries did, that that kingdom could be established suddenly
from without, but held that it could only be achieved by spiritual
forces working from within. His _ecclesia_ has lived and grown. It
has survived for nineteen centuries, and is likely to survive for many
centuries more. It has played a leading part in the making of modern
civilisation. But it is no longer a unity, and many different theories
exist as to its meaning and worth.
_The sacerdotal theory._--Broadly speaking, however, there are two
outstanding views as to the scope and function of the _ecclesia_, or
church of Jesus. One is the sacerdotal, and the other is what, for
want of a better name, I may term the evangelical. In outline the
former is as follows: before Jesus finally withdrew His bodily presence
from His disciples He formally constituted a religious society to
represent Him on earth. This society was to be the ark of salvation,
the "sphere of covenanted grace." Its principal work was to call men
out of a lost and ruined world and secure for them a blessed
immortality; those who were members of this church, and only they, were
certain of heaven. Membership therein was clearly defined; the gateway
was baptism. Those who were baptized in a proper way, even though they
were unconscious infants, were members of the church of Christ and all
others were outside. Within this sacred society souls were to be
trained in rightness of living, and, to an extent, made fit for heaven.
The Holy Spirit abiding in this society would sanctify the individual
members and guide them into all the truth. It is even held that Jesus
definitely appointed the way in which this church was to be governed.
Its affairs were to be managed by a threefold order,--bishops, priests,
and deacons. But here a division has taken place amongst the
sacerdotalists themselves owing to the necessity of finding some final
authority, some living voice, within this visible society to which
appeal in the last resort could be made. Romanists have found this in
the bishop of Rome whom they regard as the episcopal successor of the
apostle Peter. Devout Anglicans take their stand upon the faith as
defined by the first four general Councils, while in administrative
matters they regard the bishop as independent. The Greek church also
insists upon its autonomy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account