The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine: The European War, March 1915Various
History
The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine: The European War, March 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
Our supply in artillery ammunition has been largely increased. The
heavy artillery which we lacked has been provided for and seen at work
on the battlefield.
The English Army has been very heavily reinforced in November. It is
numerically stronger than at the outset of the campaign. The Indian
troops have completed their apprenticeship in European warfare.
The Belgian Army has been reorganized into six divisions. It is ready
and eager to reconquer the national territory.
A SERIES OF GERMAN REVERSES.
The enemy have failed in their abrupt attack upon Nancy.
They failed in their swift march on Paris.
They failed to envelop our left wing in August.
They failed in the same attempt in November.
They failed to pierce through our centre in September.
They failed in their attack by way of the coast on Dunkirk and Calais.
They failed in their attack on Ypres.
_The Bulletin des Armees concludes its account in these words:_
Germany has exhausted its reserves in this fruitless effort. Her newly
formed troops are raw.
Russia more and more asserts her superiority against Germany, as well
as against Austria.
The German armies after this check are fatally doomed to retreat.
All this has been accomplished during the last four months. The moment
had come to sum up these operations; the press is now free to comment
upon them.
LONG LIVE THE ALLIES!
By CLAUDE MONET.
[From King Albert's Book.]
I feel myself greatly honored by the opportunity given me to express
all my admiration of heroic Belgium, and to offer a like admiration to
the noble and valiant King of the Belgians.
Long live Belgium! Long live the Allies! Long live France!
United States Fair to All
Disclaimer of Bias Against Germany and Austria
By William J. Bryan, American Secretary of State
The following letter is the most exhaustive document that
has come from the Administration at Washington since the
outbreak of the war dealing with any aspect of the relations
of this country toward that conflict. Its length is due to
the fact that it is intended as a categorical denial of the
different charges that have been made and of the arguments
current in German circles accusing the Administration of
unfriendliness to Germany and Austria-Hungary. Senator Stone
was interested in having these charges answered for two
reasons: First, there is a large German population in St.
Louis, the chief city of his State, and, second, he is
Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations. Senator
Stone wrote his letter of inquiry on Jan. 8, saying that he
had received many letters from sympathizers with Germany and
Austria who believed the United States Government had been
showing partiality to England, France, and Russia.
WASHINGTON, Jan. 20, 1915.
_Hon. William J. Stone, Chairman Committee on Foreign Relations,
United States Senate, Washington, D.C._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account