The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine: The European War, March 1915Various
History
The New York Times Current History, A Monthly Magazine: The European War, March 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
"The revelations of Capt. Faber, which were denied as little as the
newspaper reports by which they were confirmed or completed in several
respects, also testify to this. This British Army, at Calais and
Dunkirk, would by no means march along our frontier to Longwy in order
to reach Germany. It would directly invade Belgium from the northwest.
That would give it the advantage of being able to begin operations
immediately, to encounter the Belgian Army in a region where we could
not depend on any fortress, in case we wanted to risk a battle.
Moreover, that would make it possible for it to occupy provinces rich
in all kinds of resources and, at any rate, to prevent our
mobilization or only to permit it after we had formally pledged
ourselves to carry on our mobilization to the exclusive advantage of
England and her allies.
"It is therefore of necessity to prepare a plan of battle for the
Belgian Army also for that possibility. This is necessary in the
interest of our military defense as well as for the sake of the
direction of our foreign policy, in case of war between Germany and
France."
[The text of the documents presented above is not disputed
by the Belgian Government. Instead it is made the basis of
the Belgian reply, beginning on the next page.]
* * * * *
THE BELGIAN BATTLEGROUND
By the HON. WILLIAM H. TAFT.
[From King Albert's Book.]
The heart of the world should go out to the poor people of Belgium.
Without being in any respect a party to the controversies of the war,
their country has been made the battleground of the greatest and in
some respects the most destructive war in history. Any movement to
relieve their distress has my profound sympathy.
* * * * *
[The following letter from the Belgian Legation at
Washington certifies the official character of the documents
presented below.--EDITOR.]
LEGATION DE BELGIQUE,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Jan. 25, 1915.
_To the Editor of The New York Times Current History:_
In accordance with the request, in your letter of December
10th addressed to the Belgian Minister, for official
documents published by the Legation, I have the pleasure of
sending you, herewith, by the Minister's instructions, a
copy of a pamphlet entitled "The Innocence of Belgium,"
dealing with the Military Documents published recently in
THE NEW YORK TIMES.
I also take this opportunity to transmit you a copy of a
pamphlet entitled "Why Belgium Was Devastated," containing
translations of the German Proclamations issued in Belgium.
I have the honor to be, Sir,
Your obedient servant,
JAMES GUSTAVUS WHITELEY.
[BELGIAN LEGATION ARTICLE NO. 1.]
"INNOCENCE OF BELGIUM"
"Reply to Publication of Military Documents by Germany"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account