The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915: What Americans Say to EuropeVarious
Philosophy
The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915: What Americans Say to Europe
Various
World War, 1914-1918
The extract inclosed, which is taken from an official
publication of the Belgian Government, and the extract from an
official statement by the Belgian Minister of War, prove that
the Belgian Government had never connived, or been willing to
connive, at the breach of the treaty that made the maintenance
of Belgian neutrality an international obligation. The moment
that there appeared to be danger that this treaty might be
violated the British Government made an appeal for an
assurance from both France and Germany, as had been done in
1870 by Mr. Gladstone, that neither of those countries would
violate the neutrality of Belgium if the other country
respected it. The French agreed, the Germans declined to
agree. The appeal made by the British Government is to be
found in our first "White Paper" after the outbreak of the
war.
The reason why Germany would not agree was stated very frankly
by Herr von Jagow, the German Minister for Foreign Affairs, to
Sir Edward Goschen, our Ambassador in Berlin; and it is
recorded in the second "White Paper" that we published. The
attitude of the British Government throughout has been to
endeavor to preserve the neutrality of Belgium, and we never
thought of sending troops to Belgium until Germany had invaded
it and Belgium had appealed for assistance to maintain the
international treaty.
We have known for some years past that in Holland, in Denmark,
and in Norway the Germans have inspired the apprehension that,
if England was at war with Germany, England would violate the
neutrality of those countries and seize some of their harbors.
This allegation is as baseless as the allegation about our
intention to violate the neutrality of Belgium, and events
have shown it to be so. But it seems to be a rule with Germany
to attribute to others the designs that she herself
entertains; as it is clear now that, for some long time past,
it has been a settled part of her strategic plans to attack
France through Belgium. A statement is inclosed, which was
issued by us on Oct. 14 last, dealing with this point.
This memorandum and its inclosures should provide ample
material for a reply to the German statements.
Foreign Office, Nov. 9, 1914.
* * * * *
Belgian Official Denials.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account