The Non-Christian Cross: An Enquiry into the Origin and History of the Symbol Eventually Adopted as That of Our ReligionParsons, John Denham
Religion
The Non-Christian Cross: An Enquiry into the Origin and History of the Symbol Eventually Adopted as That of Our Religion
Parsons, John Denham
Crosses
"It must be owned that ancient objects of Art, as
far as hitherto known, afford no corroboration of the use
of the cross in the simple transverse form familiar to
us at any period preceding or even closely succeeding
the words of St. Chrysostom."
That is to say, although Constantine introduced the Monogram of Christ
and the cross of four equal arms before St. Chrysostom was born, and,
making them symbols of the Roman Empire, would, whether a Sun-God
worshipper or a Christian, in any case have imposed them upon what he
established as his State Religion, it was not till after these solar
symbols of the Gauls were accepted as Christian that such a cross as
could possibly have been a representation of an instrument of execution
was introduced.
As to the crucifix, we are told that though this is said by some to be
referred to in the works of St. Gregory of Nyssa--a Bishop of Tours who
lived in the sixth century, and also in the injunctions of the often
quoted council of Greek bishops A.C. 692 called the "Quini-sextum" or
"in Trullo," the evidence is
"Insufficient to convince most modern archaeologists
that a crucifix in any sense now accepted was meant."
In other words, not only is it clear that the cross as a representation
of the instrument of execution upon which Jesus died was not introduced
till after the days of Constantine, but it is also evident that the
crucifix, the earliest known representation of that execution, was not
introduced till centuries later.
Other noteworthy admissions are made in the work above quoted from, but
we must pass on to the Dean of Canterbury's comparatively recent work
upon the same subject.
Dean Farrar states upon page 11 of his _Life of Christ as represented
in Art_ that "Of all early Christian symbols the _Fish_ was the most
frequent and the favourite."
The Fish; and not the Cross.
Moreover the Dean significantly adds upon the next page, that the Fish
"Continued to be a common symbol down to the
days of Constantine."
And the significance lies in the fact that the introduction by
Constantine of the solar symbols venerated by the Gauls, may account
for the displacement of the symbol of the Fish from favour.
Upon page 19 Dr. Farrar goes on to say that
"Two symbols continued for ages to be especially common,
of which I have not yet spoken. They were not generally
adopted, even if they appeared at all, until after the
Peace of the Church at the beginning of the fourth
century. I mean the cross and the monogram of Christ."
Here again, it will be seen, the Dean admits that the cross, as the
symbol of our religion, came in with Constantine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account