The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussedGathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
History
The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussed
Gathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
America -- Discovery and exploration -- Norse
The little we know of Markland fits Nova Scotia very well. ‘Much wood
and many beasts’ may, of course, be descriptive of Newfoundland and
its caribou, but it would also be true of Nova Scotia. In the voyage
of Mr. Hill of Redrife in 1593, given in Hakluyt, a casual run ashore
at Cape Breton is thus described;—‘and as they viewed the country they
saw divers beastes and foules, as black foxes, deere, otters, &c.,
&c.’. It is apparent that as late as the sixteenth century the fauna
of Nova Scotia was sufficiently plentiful to strike a ship’s crew as
soon as they went ashore. The description of the country given in the
Flatey Book, which is unlike anything Icelandic and consequently sounds
genuine, will suit the southern extremity of Nova Scotia, a very likely
landfall, much better than Newfoundland. It is low-lying and wooded, as
Champlain found between Port Mouton and Cape Negro,—‘the shores which
I saw, up to that point, are very low, and covered with such wood as
that seen at the Cap de la Heve’. As to the white sand we may compare
Hudson’s description,—‘The land by the water side is low land, and
_white sandie_ banks rising, full of little hills.’
While there is no sufficient extent of beach in Nova Scotia to serve
for Furdustrands, there is enough sand as a local feature to suit the
conditions required for Markland.
In their identification of Wineland with New England rather than Nova
Scotia, the older school are on even less questionable ground, however
rash their speculations on points of detail. Indeed, there seems to be
a tendency at the present day, which is exemplified in the conclusions
of Mr. Babcock, to depart so far from Storm’s theories as to include a
part of the New England coast-line. The addition of New England gets
over the formidable difficulties before noticed, of want of space for
the whole of Karlsefni’s expedition, and almost entire absence of the
wild vine. Whether or no we must also include Nova Scotia in the ‘third
land’ visited by the Norsemen, we shall be well advised to look for
Hóp, at any rate, along the coast of the United States. Personally,
I feel strongly that Nova Scotia is needed for Markland, and that
Wineland must have been situated altogether to the west or south-west
of it.
Before entering upon the more detailed consideration of the voyages
which forms the subject of the ensuing chapters, I would provisionally
fix the broad lines of our research in accordance with the arguments
adduced above. Helluland will then be in all probability Newfoundland
and Labrador considered as one country, or perhaps Newfoundland alone;
Markland will be Nova Scotia; and Wineland, the most important area in
the inquiry, somewhere on the eastern seaboard of the United States.
_Postscript on two recent theories._
It will be convenient here to deal with the theories advanced by two
recent writers, whose works did not come to my notice until all the
chapters of the present volume were written. These are:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account