The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussedGathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
History
The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussed
Gathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
America -- Discovery and exploration -- Norse
What follows is therefore put forward rather as an interesting
suggestion than as a vital part of the main argument. But assuming
that the sentence under consideration refers to the relation between
Straumsfjord and Hóp, we know that mountains or hills were features of
the landscape of both these places, and such features are not elsewhere
specifically mentioned. If I am right in supposing Straumsfjord to be
Long Island Sound and Hóp the estuary or lower waters of the Hudson,
it would be quite correct to say that hills visible from the one place
would also be visible from the other. If, as seems probable, the camp
or base at Straumsfjord lay near the island at its mouth, it would
also be true to say that any such mountain would be about the same
distance from that camp, whether approached via Long Island Sound or
by a route to the south of Long Island. As the explorers did nothing
else, till the first winter at Straumsfjord, except investigate their
surroundings, it is more than likely that they cruised sufficiently
far up the sound to be able to see hills also visible from the Hudson
valley. If this interpretation could be relied on it would therefore
afford a strong confirmation of the topography suggested in this
chapter, and I feel that this may be the correct explanation of the
passage. It is safer, however, to treat the sentence as irremediably
corrupt, and to conclude that the information it appears to contain may
be a mere gloss, or may express a mistaken notion of the explorers. It
is one of the many points as to which certainty is impossible, but it
equally cannot afford a valid argument against theories which would
otherwise be acceptable.
IX. AFTERMATH AND CONCLUSION.
‘And here’, in the words of Eric’s Saga, ‘this story ends.’ The
attempt at colonization had proved a failure; the snows of Iceland
and Greenland were thenceforward to be preferred to the chance of
frequent collision with the Wineland Skrælings. No further attempt at a
permanent settlement seems ever to have been made.
It by no means follows that the newly-discovered countries remained
unvisited. A land full of timber, lying but a few days’ sail from
Greenland, where such a commodity was unobtainable, must almost
certainly have tempted the members of Eric’s small colony at any rate
to occasional visits. Of these we could not, in the nature of things,
expect to hear much. Always more or less isolated by its dangerous
coast and the little-known sea which separated it from Iceland,
Greenland became after 1294 almost entirely cut off from the land
of saga by the Norwegian royal edict making trade with the former
country a crown monopoly. The minor enterprises of the colonists were,
moreover, of little or no interest to Icelandic audiences.[104]
_Entries in the Annals._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account