The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
and fifty-eight years after the great hurricane and 4994 from the
creation of the world, there was another destruction of this land,
which was of the Quinametin, giants who lived in New Spain, which
destruction was a great trembling of the earth, which swallowed up and
killed them, the mountains and volcanoes burst upon them, that for a
certainty none should escape. At the same time many of the Toltecs
perished and the Chichimecs their neighbors. That was in the year Ce
Tecpatl; and this age they call Tlachilonatnip, that is to say, sun [or
age] of earth.”[376] Here follows an account of the construction of
the calendar by the assembly of Lords in Hue hue Tlapalan in the year
5097 of the creation of the world and 104 after the destruction of the
giants.
The singular agreement of this account with the Mosaic description,
in some of its details, such as the height attained by the waters
above the mountains, the escape of certain persons in an ark, and
the erection of a high tower, together with the subsequent confusion
of tongues, Lord Kingsborough is convinced furnishes proof that the
Toltecs were of Jewish descent.[377] While we are not prepared to
believe the sanguine speculations of that eminent author in this
case, still one of two views must be true: either the Toltecs were
of old world origin, and at a remote period treasured up among their
traditional histories notices of the Mosaic deluge, traditions of
which are so generally current among the Asiatic nations, or the
Mexican traditions of local inundation were warped by the teachings
of the Spanish priests in a degree beyond any precedent in history
or reasonable expectation, and that within a comparatively few years
after the conquest. Our authority in this case is a native of Tezcuco,
a son of the queen; and because of his acquaintance with both the
hieroglyphic writings and the Castilian, served as interpreter to
the viceroy. His _Relacions_ were composed from the archives of
his family and compared with the testimony of the oldest and best
informed natives. It does not seem to us that the sense of historic
integrity cultivated to so nice a point at Tezcuco, where the censorial
council, just prior to the advent of the conquerors, punished with
death any who should willfully pervert the truth, could have so
sadly degenerated that Ixtlilxochitl and the venerable natives who
were conscious of the representations contained in his work, should
proclaim a falsehood which would not meet with contradiction.[378] We
are aware that this author’s chronology is an inextricable maze of
contradictions which cannot be unravelled or reconstructed. The Toltec
families, seven in number, are, however, said to have reached Hue hue
Tlapalan five hundred and twenty years after the flood. The journey,
however, occupied only one hundred and four years of that time. Their
wanderings, attended with severe experiences, nakedness, and hunger and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account