The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
at Chicomoztoc they continued the occupation of boatmen, which they
had followed while in Aztlan.[425] By way of summary, then, we may
venture the following: 1. Viewed from the standpoint of Sr. Ramirez,
Aztlan may be located somewhere not far distant from Chalco Lake. The
islands which it encircles may correspond to the description of the
ancient home of the Aztecs, given by Duran as quoted on page 257 and
described as Culhuacan. Teo-Culhuacan, where the Aztecs sacrificed
yearly, may be the city of Culhuacan situated in that neighborhood. As
additional testimony we have the fact that most of the stations named
in the migrations can be located in the Central Mexican region. The
report that they came from the north may refer only to the scattering
of the Nahua or Toltec people from Tollan, just north of the valley.
2. The statements of all the writers that the Aztecs came from the
north, the fact that Duran and Sahagun assign the primitive Nahua home
to the region of Florida, and the prevalence of mounds and shell-heaps
in great numbers in the Gulf States, together with the extension of
those mounds through Texas into Mexico, may warrant the opinion that
Aztlan was in the Mississippi Valley, or, looking in another direction,
the rock or cave dwellings recently discovered in Southern Utah and
the Rocky Mountain region (of which we shall give a description in
the next chapter) may indicate the locality of the ancient and
much-sought-for land. The identity in meaning of Chicomoztoc (seven
caves) and Tulan Zuiva (seven caves) together with the fact that both
places in Quiché and Nahua history were the point of separation for
many tribes, is a singular coincidence, if they are not one and the
same. In the preceding chapter we have seen that Tulan Zuiva of the
Quichés was in a northern or at least a colder climate, where they
suffered greatly for want of fire, a fact of no little significance. On
the other hand Teo-Culhuacan, the place of yearly sacrifice, may have
been a city of the Chiapan region, since Sahagun located Tamoanchan the
first city of the Nahuas (Olmec) after their arrival from Florida in
Mexico, somewhere in the Usumacinta Valley. It is possible that a large
number of the immigrants remained behind the company which migrated
northward to Teotihuacan and thence to the seven caves, subsequently
uniting with the Toltecs at Tollan. This view has had quite a number
of advocates.[426] We will not undertake, in the present state of
knowledge on the subject, to decide which of these three claims is the
true one, if either one of them is correct. Our only wish is to furnish
the reader a margin for his choice. It seems to us that it would be
unscientific to attempt to decide a question based upon such slender
and contradictory data.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account