The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
The Cholulans, out of respect to Quetzalcoatl, placed the government in
the hands of the recipients of his blessing. His statue was placed in
a sanctuary on the pyramid, but in a reclining position, representing
a state of repose, with the understanding that it shall be placed upon
its feet when the god returns. When Cortés landed, they believed their
hopes realized, sacrificed a man to him, and sprinkled the blood of the
unhappy victim upon the conqueror and his companions.[435]
Father Sahagun, when on his journey to Mexico, was everywhere asked
if he had not come from Tlapalla.[436] No wonder when the fleet of
Cortés hove in sight on the horizon, almost in the same place where
Quetzalcoatl’s bark had disappeared, that the Mexican, who had been
waiting centuries for the prince of peace to return, believed his
waiting to be at an end. No wonder that he inquired of the distant and
mysterious Tlapalla. In this state of expectancy we find a most natural
and fruitful soil for the operations of the Spanish conquerors.
Such is the form into which the mass of legends concerning
Quetzalcoatl have been woven. There is scarcely a doubt, however, that
it is a matter of growth—is the accumulation of several centuries.
The name Quetzalcoatl (Nahua), Gucumatz (Quiché) and Cukulcan (Maya),
translated “feathered” or “plumed” or “winged” serpent, may originally
have been applied to an intelligent princely foreigner who was cast
upon the shores of the Central American region, and who introduced the
art of casting metals, and especially taught agriculture. His doctrines
of peace and virtue may have been sufficiently wide-spread to have
brought about the prosperity which is ascribed to his age. From this
standpoint we would consider him at first to have cast his lot among
the descendants of Votan, otherwise known as the “Serpents,” from which
occurrence he may have received his name of “Feathered Serpent.” On
pages 241–42 we referred to the statements of the Codex Chimalpopoca,
that Quetzalcoatl, becoming obnoxious to his companions, who seem to
be Quichés, forsook them. The account also states that he afterwards
brought maize to Tamoanchan (the city of the Nahuas). Our next account
of him describes him as figuring among the Olmecs at Cholula. This
realistic view of the tradition applies to the first Quetzalcoatl,
who may have been an actual man. While entertaining this view, we
must not forget that centuries prior to this period (which we may as
well assign to the first or second century as to any other date), the
Quichés possessed the ideal of such a personage whom they considered
a deity, who figures so actively in their cosmogony under the name of
Gucumatz. This deity was the vivifying force in nature, the bringer of
the gentle south winds, the god of the harvest and of the air. He was
best symbolized to the mind of the savage by the vernal shower and the
return of spring.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account