The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
They sailed out beyond the Pillars of
Hercules to their colonies in the Canaries, whence the trade-winds bore
them across the Atlantic to the shores of Florida. Ezekiel xxvii. 26,
is quoted as proof: “Thy rowers have brought thee into great waters;
the east wind hath broken thee in the midst of the seas.”[193] The
theory that the ancient Americans descended from the Greeks has been
incidentally advocated by several authors, most of the arguments being
based upon supposed Greek inscriptions. Two advocates of the theory
are, however, quite decided in its defence, namely, Mr. Pidegeon[194]
and Mr. Lafitau.[195] The latter believing that the ancient
inhabitants of the Grecian archipelago were driven from their country
by Og, king of Bashan, supposes the inhabitants of the new world
descended from that people, and cites numerous analogies of a political
and social nature.[196] No claim has been advanced, we believe, which
advocates an actual Egyptian colonization of the new world, but strong
arguments have been used to show that the architecture and sculpture
of Central America and Mexico have been influenced from Egypt, if
not attributable directly to Egyptian artisans. These arguments are
based on the resemblance between the gigantic pyramids, the sculptured
obelisks, and the numerous idols of these pre-historic countries and
those of Egypt. It requires no practised eye to trace a resemblance in
general features, though it must be said that the details of American
architecture and sculpture, are peculiarly original in design.[197]
The principal advocate of the theory, Delafield, has furnished many
comparisons, but we think no argument has been presented sufficiently
supported by facts to prove that American architecture and sculpture
had any other than an indigenous origin.[198] Turning westward our
attention is arrested by the probability of the theory which claims
that this continent was peopled with the Tartars and nations occupying
the regions of North-western Asia. No one can consider the natural
certainty of long-continued communication between the two continents
at Behring’s Straits without being impressed with the truth that that
narrow channel served probably as the first highway between the old
world and the new, and _vice versa_. Certainly a part of the ancient
population of America came upon our soil at that quarter. Mr. Bancroft
remarks: “The customs, manner of life, and physical appearance of the
natives on both sides of the straits are identical, as a multitude
of witnesses testify, and it seems absurd to argue the question from
any point. Of course, Behring’s Strait may have served to admit other
nations besides the people inhabiting its shores into America, and
in such cases there is more room for discussion.”[199] Nearly as
plausible is the theory which claims that if the original population
of this continent were not Japanese, at least a considerable infusion
of Japanese blood into the original stock has taken place from time to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account