The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
pieces looked as if they were of solid metal.”[231] The Mayas wore
cotton armour similar to that of the Mexicans, and bore a shield also.
Breastplates of copper have been found in the Atlantic region, and many
of the Amerinds there used body armour of wood, skins, and bark.
[Illustration: CHIPPED FLINT]
[Illustration: CHIPPED FLINT BLUNT ARROW-HEAD, GEORGIA]
[Illustration: CHIPPED FLINT IMPLEMENT, TENNESSEE]
[Illustration: SPECIMEN “CORES,” OR BLOCKS OF FLINT
From which flakes were struck off for making arrow-heads, etc.
Usually about 3 in. long in the U. S., but longer elsewhere
]
[Illustration: SPECIMEN OF CHIPPED FLINT DISCS, CALLED “TURTLEBACK,”
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY]
[Illustration: GROOVED STONE AXE, TENNESSEE (GROUND)]
Another kind of defensive armour, though its qualities were purely
imaginary, is the so-called “ghost-shirt” (see illustration, page
157) made of cloth or skin, and resembling the ordinary war-shirt of
the Dakota. This shirt came into notice during the “Ghost Dance”[232]
excitement that began about 1890 and lasted for six or eight years.
It was worn by all men, women, and children who accepted the “Ghost”
doctrine, either as an outside or under garment, and it was implicitly
believed that no bullet or other weapon could penetrate its sacred
material.[233] As already remarked in another chapter, the Amerinds
in modern times, of at least the United States region, usually went
into battle naked. The only defensive armour was, as Mooney records,
“his protecting medicine,” which consisted of “a feather, a tiny bag
of some sacred powder, the claw of an animal, the head of a bird, or
some other small object, which could be readily twisted into his hair
or hidden between the covers of his shield.... Its virtue depended
entirely on the ceremony of the consecration, and not on size or
texture. The war-paint had the same magic power of protection.... The
so-called ‘war-shirt’ was worn chiefly in ceremonial dress parades and
only rarely on the warpath.”[234] Just when the armour which protected
by its intrinsic strength was abandoned for the protection of the
“medicine” is not, so far as I am aware, at present known. At one time,
it seems quite certain, the material protection of armour was almost
universal over the whole of North America, while in our latter day no
one ever saw an Amerind fight with armour on. The idea of going into
battle nude was that the warrior’s movements were unincumbered, while
his “medicine” afforded him ample protection. A Navajo who posed for
me for a picture in Arizona described the Navajo manner of going to
battle, but never mentioned armour, or any kind of protection. He said
they always went naked, with even their hair untied from its customary
knot and falling loose on the shoulders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account