The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
The _Popol Vuh_, the great collection of Quiche myths, presents
Gukumatz as one of the four principal gods who created the world.
Gukumatz means shining or brilliant snake, and hence seems to be
the same character as that known to the Nahuatls, or Aztecs, as
Quetzalcohuatl, whose name also means bright or shining snake. But
among the Aztecs Quetzalcohuatl is represented as a man, while Gukumatz
is purely a god. Quetzalcohuatl was the third of the four Mexican or
Aztec gods, and to him is ascribed all the wisdom which came to the
Aztecs. He appears under two forms, as a god and as an historical
personage. He has been frequently identified with the dawn, but there
seems to be good reason for believing that he was a real character, who
became deified as his good deeds passed down to successive generations.
Such prophets and teachers rise up in all times, in all ages, by the
wayside of tribal or national development, like some rare and favoured
tree of the forest which out-tops all the others. A divine origin may
be claimed for these teachers and prophets, but generally they are only
men endowed with an extremely fine moral sense and with a perception
and knowledge beyond their time. “Among the Tzendals of Chiapas, the
tradition of Votan, who is said to have been the first founder of
that tribe, bears great resemblance to Quetzalcohuatl.”[356] After an
admirable discussion of the subject of the character and origin of
Quetzalcohuatl, Bandelier sifts the matter down to this: that he was “a
prominent gifted Indian leader, who certainly preceded the coming of
those Nahuatl tribes that subsequently formed the valley confederacy,
as well as that of the later tribe of Tlaxcallan. The claim to his
origin accordingly rests between the so-called Toltecs on one side
and the Olmeca and Xicalanca on the other.”[357] Brinton believed
that Quetzalcohuatl was a pure personification of the dawn myth,[358]
but there is too much testimony on the opposite side to permit the
acceptance of this opinion as final. It must not be forgotten that
there were very good, extremely good, almost saintly, men, and women,
too, among the Amerinds. The historical Mexican tribes were preceded
by other tribes, some of which had apparently reached a higher state
of culture than the Aztecs, and Quetzalcohuatl possibly came from one
of them as a teacher to the newer and less cultivated people; newer
in the sense of having come into that region from some distance off.
There is nothing preposterous in supposing that there were teachers
and moralists in the early days of this continent. The character of
a high-thinking teacher is not incompatible with some of the tribes
that have lived and died on North-American soil. As stated previously,
never were all the tribes of the continent in one culture condition;
there were always tribes that could teach something to other tribes,
and undoubtedly philanthropic individuals sometimes attempted the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account