The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
Back of the Conquest of Mexico by Cortes, the thread of authentic
history becomes most uncertain. It begins about the sixth century.
Ixtlilxochitl, the native Mexican, has written a good deal, but it
must be taken, oftentimes, with extreme caution. The history of the
Amerind race is written mainly by their conquerors. It is a one-sided
affair, and even so is not pleasant reading. Balzac says: “Historians
are privileged liars, who lend their pen to popular beliefs.” Certainly
the character of the Amerind and his doings have not often been too
charitably drawn, while, on the other hand, our actions toward him,
even as related by ourselves, are enough to make one sometimes doubt
the benefits of civilisation. Morgan, speaking of the remnant of the
Senecas, says: “To embitter their sense of desolation as a nation, the
pre-emptive right to these last remnants of their ancient possessions
is now held by a company of land speculators, the Ogden Land Company,
who, to wrest away these few acres, have pursued and hunted them
for the last fourteen years with a degree of wickedness hardly to
be paralleled in the history of human avarice. Not only have every
principle of honesty, every dictate of humanity, every Christian
precept been violated by this company in their eager artifices to
despoil the Senecas; but the darkest frauds, the basest bribery, and
the most execrable intrigues which soulless avarice could suggest,
have been practised in open day upon this defenceless and much injured
people.”[401]
[Illustration: APACHE WOMAN CARRYING WATER IN A WICKER BOTTLE]
On one occasion in 1643, out of a spirit of revenge for a murder
committed by an Indian who had been infuriated by whisky, but whose
friends, according to Amerind custom, offered to pay a blood indemnity,
Governor Kieft, heading a band of soldiers and freebooters from Dutch
privateers, fell upon the unsuspecting Algonquins and slaughtered over
a hundred of them. Little children were tossed into the river, and the
parents who plunged to the rescue were prevented from landing by the
soldiers, and child and parent both perished. In this incident began
the Dutch and Indian War, which lasted two years. Can anyone condemn
them for going to war after such treatment?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account