The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
intercourse with the Europeans, so that in 1750 they were about half
their former number. The league was probably formed about the middle
of the sixteenth century, and in these two hundred years they reached
their highest power and were on the wane. As it must have taken them
some time to reach the point where they could form such a body as the
league, they must have been a powerful and progressive people at least
a hundred years before, so that their main existence as a progressive
people probably covered a period of some three hundred years if not
more. Had they not been wrecked by contact with Europeans, it is safe
to assume that they would have advanced to double their power, at
least, in another century. They destroyed the Siouan tribes of the
East, held the Lenapé in subjection, and terrorised the Algonquins as
far as the banks of the Mississippi.
[Illustration: BLACK HAWK
The great central figure in the Black Hawk War, 1832
George Catlin
]
[Illustration: PORTION OF THE SO-CALLED “PALACE” OF LABNA, YUCATAN
Construction: stone. Site: tropical forest. Abandoned in
prehistoric times
Saville says: “The entire surface of the country is covered with
forests.... Immediately to the south and west no white man has ever
penetrated beyond the first range of hills; and who can tell what
gems of ancient architecture lie buried in the wilderness”
Photographed by M. H. Saville, 1890
]
King Philip, Red Jacket, Pontiac, Black Hawk, and many other Amerinds
distinguished themselves as men of wide capacity, and in our later day
may be mentioned the famous Sitting Bull, whose sagacity, intelligence,
and military skill were of an extremely high order. He gave us much
trouble, to be sure, but if all is fair in war, Sitting Bull deserves
great praise for his ability.
In war the Amerinds were given to killing all they could, but as this
is the business of war, and as white armies use weapons that are also
meant to kill, and seem to try to do killing in battle, we cannot be
too hard on the Amerind warrior if he did not always do his killing
exactly in the way we do it. “Murder as a fine art” was not one of his
studies. He killed and we kill; where is the difference? Wars may be
necessary; I think they sometimes are; so did the Amerind.
[Illustration: MUSICAL BOW OF THE SOUTHERN TEPEHUANES AND THE AZTECS,
MEXICO
The sounding-board is a gourd with a hole in it. The other end
of the brace attached to the bow rests on a stone. The cord of
the bow was struck by a stick to produce the desired noise. Found
by Lumholtz in use. Length of bow, 1 metre 36.5 centimetres. See
page 308; and also article on “Geographical Distribution of the
Musical Bow” by O. T. Mason, _American Anthropologist_, November,
1897; _Natural History of the Musical Bow_, by Henry Balfour; and
“Symbolism of the Huichol Indians,” by Carl Lumholtz, _Memoirs of
the American Museum_, vol. iii, pages 206, 207
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account