The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
As there were outlaws among the whites, so too there were outlaws among
the Amerinds. These were men from various tribes who had committed
crimes and escaped the punishment they should have received according
to the law of their people, and coming together they sometimes formed a
band by themselves in some strong and isolated position. A good example
of such a band of renegades was that of one Patnish in south-eastern
Utah near the Navajo mountain. It was composed of outlaws from the
surrounding tribes, chiefly Utes and Navajos, and was the terror of
the country, though in 1872, when I first knew of it, nothing in the
way of serious depredation had been attempted for several years. The
Mormons of southern Utah looked upon Patnish as a dangerous man, yet
he sometimes came to their frontier villages in a peaceful way. He
had three or four stalwart sons who usually accompanied him in his
travels, and they were always ready for emergencies. The band wore the
Navajo dress and, I understood, preferred to be considered Navajos.
Beckwourth mentions a renegade band of this sort in his time, a village
“composed of outlaws from all the surrounding tribes, who were expelled
from their various communities for sundry infractions of their rude
criminal code; they had acquired a hard name for their cruelties and
excesses, and many white traders were known to have been killed by
them.... The village numbered three hundred lodges, and could bring
from twelve to fifteen hundred warriors into the field.... We called it
the City of Refuge.”[405] He speaks of them as Cheyennes, but I suppose
they were Cheyennes in the same way that Patnish’s band were Navajos;
because they preferred to be called so.
These outlaws often caused trouble between the better class of Amerinds
and the whites, because, especially in the earlier days, an “Indian”
was an “Indian” always and everywhere, and a crime of the outlaws or
others was revenged upon the first “Indian” that was met with. There
never was any inquiry to find out if he committed the crime; he was
generally shot on sight. Innocence was a quality never thought of in
dealing with “Indians.” By reason of their birth, they were all guilty
of any crime perpetrated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account