The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
A list of the principal stocks or families, tribes, and many sub-tribes
of the North American Amerinds, based on the linguistic classification
of the U. S. Bureau of Ethnology, as given in the _Seventh Annual
Report_; on Brinton’s classification in his _The American Race_,
on Mason’s “Linguistic Families of Mexico,” in the _American
Anthropologist_, N. S., vol. ii., No. 1; in _Mexico_, Washington, 1900,
Bureau of American Republics; Dall’s Tribes of the Extreme Northwest,
_Contributions to North American Ethnology_, vol. i.; James Mooney’s
_Siouan Tribes of the East_; and on lists in the _Bibliographies_ of
James C. Pilling, with tribal names from other sources.
+List of Stocks and Sub-Stocks+[408]
The abbreviations are the ones used in the alphabetical list of tribes.
By referring back from that list to this, the linguistic affinity and
general geographical location of a tribe may be determined. The author
has added the term “+Hopitan+” as a sub-stock of the +Shoshonean+
to designate the group of Hopi tribes, which, while showing strong
linguistic affinity, are otherwise, like the +Piman+ and +Nahuatlan+,
so markedly separated in habits from the true +Shoshonean+ stock that
an individual classification for them seems desirable. As the +Hopitan+
are ranked as +Shoshonean+ in the general scheme the harmony of the
classification is not interfered with. +Puebloan+ is also given as a
comprehensive descriptive term for all the permanent house-building
tribes, regardless of linguistic affinities, or ancient or modern
existence. This is necessary because it is not possible to assign a
linguistic place to the former occupants of ruins like those of the
Chaco, yet it is settled that they were of a kind with the other
town builders. Thus, also, the Cliff-dwellers may be conveniently
classed under this head. Tusayan and Cibola, as applied respectively
to the +Hopitan+ and the +Zuñian+, should never be used, for the
reason that it is not certain that these are the places that were so
designated by Coronado in 1540. The author believes they were not seen
by Coronado.[409] It is in the interest of accuracy to avoid these
unnecessary designations, which confuse ethnological and geographical
matters.
_Ada._ +Adaizan.+ Western Louisiana.
_Alq._ +Algonquian.+ North-east third of the continent, from
Tennessee and Montana.
_Ath._ +Athapascan.+ North-west part of the continent, and from the
Utah-Colorado line southward into Mexico. There are also some
small groups on the Pacific coast in south-western Oregon and
north-western California.
_Att._ +Attacapan.+ Southern Louisiana.
_Beo._ +Beothukan.+ Northern Newfoundland. Extinct. Formerly all
Newfoundland.
_Cad._ +Caddoan.+ Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, and North Dakota.
_Crb._ +Caribbean.+ Caribbean Islands and British Honduras. Also
probably Florida and S. E. United States at a very early period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account