The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
Cushing describes the Havasupai in Arizona as using a wicker tray lined
with clay for the purpose of roasting or parching seeds, and this
was probably used by all primitive peoples. The seeds were placed on
the clay-lined tray and agitated with live coals. Naturally the clay
is hardened by the heat of the coals, and would be sure to suggest
the making of utensils from it by means of fire. The turning up of
the edges would follow the use of the first trays made of clay, in
imitation of wicker bowls, and so would other forms of basketry be
imitated, as well as forms in horn, wood or shell. Perhaps the wicker
jugs may have been coated with clay on the outside for protection, and
eventually the heat not only baked the clay but destroyed the wicker
framework that had supported it. Thus jugs of clay may have been made
by burning away the framework every time, just as Lamb’s discoverer of
roast pig could find no other way of securing his toothsome morsel than
that of burning down the house. Or the jar may have been modelled on
the inside and then the wicker burned off. When we speak contemptuously
of primitive peoples it is well to remember that they were inventors as
well as ourselves.
[Illustration: IROQUOIS BIRCHBARK VESSEL
NORTH-WEST COAST BASKET
]
When the art of pottery was discovered basketry remained in use, for
pottery could not take its place in many uses then any more than it can
to-day. The environment and habits of a tribe controlled the amount,
the quality, the character, of both basketry and pottery. A tribe
possessing plenty of good clay would make more and better pottery than
one finding clay difficult to acquire, provided both had reached the
same degree of proficiency in this art, but mere abundance of good
clay would not necessarily make skilful potters; that is, the degree
of progress in culture of a tribe and other factors of environment
than the presence or absence of good clay in quantity had much to do
with pottery-making. For example, the Pueblos and the Navajos occupy
the same kind of a region, or rather the same region, with plenty of
clay and a similar abundance of yucca, willows, etc., for basketry,
yet the Pueblos carried pottery-making to a high degree of excellence,
while the Navajos produced only a limited amount of inferior ware. Nor
is this a matter of intelligence, for the Navajos are as intelligent
as any Amerinds living, and besides, as has been mentioned, probably
have a strong infusion of Pueblo blood. While the Navajos have gone
farther in silver- and iron-smithing, they have lagged behind in
pottery and house-building. So it is also with basketry. While the
Pueblos no longer make boiling-baskets or jugs, or at least, if they
do occasionally make them, they do not use them for cooking purposes,
yet they produce some fine trays and bowls.[78] Inclination and fancy,
as well as necessity, have much to do with the development of the
arts. Tribes might attain a wonderful development politically, like
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account