The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
The valley of the Mississippi is as prolific in its yield of pottery
as the South-west, though most of it is found in mounds. It has
therefore been attributed to a departed and mysterious race which has
been called “Moundbuilder.” These mounds, however, were clearly the
work of different tribes and were erected for different purposes, and
there is no evidence to show that the builders were not Amerinds,
similar to tribes that were encountered by our people. True, some of
these tribes or stocks may have become extinct before whites entered
the region, for tribes rose to power, dwindled, and disappeared, but
that does not prove that they were anything but Amerinds, even though
they may have developed qualities and arts not practised by Amerinds
we have known. That there are some marked differences between some
of the so-called Moundbuilder ware and some other Amerind pottery
is freely admitted, but why this should indicate that there was any
mystery about the former is not intelligible, for there are many
differences in the products of existing tribes and stocks.[84] As has
been mentioned, the Pueblos are extremely good potters, while their
neighbours the Navajos practically are no potters at all. Had the
Pueblos become extinct before the appearance of the European, what a
fine chance this would have been to speculate on who these mysterious
and departed people were who built superior houses of stone and made
splendid pottery! Oh no, they could never have been common “Indians,”
they must have been a migration from China, or Japan! Unfortunately for
writers of the romantic school, the Pueblo is still there, and he is an
ordinary Amerind, in some ways hardly as intelligent as his neighbour
who makes no pottery and builds no houses. There is no reason, then,
for assuming that there was anything extraordinary about any of the
former occupants of the Mississippi valley. They were, at least some of
them were, skilful potters, and some had sense enough to dig out copper
and hammer it into shapes; but what is there in this that should lead
us to exalt them above other Amerinds? Progress in the arts may vary
among associated stocks, and also among different branches of the same
stock. In the Mississippi-valley pottery there was a tendency toward
upright bottle-shaped vessels with long necks, while the tendency of
the Pueblo ware is in the direction of the bowl. There are also long
tray-like vessels in the Mississippi valley, which do not occur at all
amongst the Pueblo ware, and there are more animal shapes, birds, etc.
A series of the Mississippi-valley forms suggests a knowledge of the
wheel, but it is not likely that they had it, though it is possible.
Anyone who has watched the progress of a common jug turning on one
of our potter’s wheels, must be struck by the series of fine shapes
the lump of clay passes through before assuming its last form. Such
a progression appears in the Mississippi valley ware, but these jars
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account