The nutrition of manChittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Science
The nutrition of man
Chittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Nutrition
To Liebig (1842) the next great advance was due. This phenomenally
clear-minded man, while recognizing at their full value the fundamental
theories advanced by Lavoisier, saw and fully appreciated their
incompleteness, and he likewise understood their failure to explain
many of the phenomena of life more familiar to the physiological mind
than to that of a simple chemist like Lavoisier. Liebig had made a
special study of the chemical composition of foodstuffs, and likewise
of the tissues and organs of the body. He had, moreover, given great
attention to the decomposition products formed in the body, especially
the nitrogenous substances excreted through the kidneys, as well as the
carbon dioxide and water passed out through the lungs and skin. It was
not strange, therefore, that he should take exception to Lavoisier’s
view that oxidation in the body consisted in the combustion of a
fluid, rich in carbon and hydrogen, which was brought to the lungs.
On the contrary, Liebig contended that it was the organic compounds,
proteids, fats, and carbohydrates, that underwent oxidation, and not
necessarily in the lungs, but all over the body, wherever organs and
tissues were active. Especially noteworthy was the view advanced by
Liebig, and upheld for many years, that of these three classes of
compounds the proteids alone served for the construction of organized
tissues, like muscle, and that in the activity of this tissue, as
in muscle contraction or muscle work, the energy for the work was
derived solely from the breaking down or oxidation of this organized
proteid. On this ground he termed the proteid foodstuffs “plastic,” or
tissue-building foods. Liebig further pointed out that the substances
of the body have the power of combining with and holding on to the
inspired oxygen, and that fats and carbohydrates, _i. e._, the
non-nitrogenous compounds, easily undergo oxidation or combustion, and
thereby furnish the heat of the body. For this reason he termed the
corresponding foodstuffs “respiratory” foods. Proteids, on the other
hand, according to Liebig’s view, are capable of combustion only in
slight degree. The cause of the decomposition of proteid substances in
the body was to be traced solely to muscle work, _i. e._, the energy
of muscle contraction, or muscle work, was derived from the breaking
down of the proteids of the muscle tissue, and work was the stimulus
which brought about proteid decomposition. Non-nitrogenous substances
played no part in these reactions; muscle work was without influence
on these compounds, oxygen being the sole stimulus which led to their
combustion, and heat was the sole product of the combustion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account