As we look at these results, the nitrogen gain for the first and second days of the third experiment and the first day of the second experiment may well attract our attention, since they show an astonishing laying by of proteid, or gain of flesh, under the influence of a comparatively small increase in the fuel value of the food. A gain of 5.98 grams of nitrogen means 37.3 grams of proteid, or more than an ounce; by no means an inconsiderable addition for one day to the store of tissue proteid. In the third experiment, where plasmon (dried, milk proteid) was added to the diet, there is to be noted a gradual falling off in the proteid-sparing power, which may perhaps be interpreted as implying that the body was practically saturated with proteid, and that owing to this fact the body was unable to continue its laying hold of nitrogen. In the entire period of 21 days, however, the body had succeeded in accumulating a store of 62.8 grams of nitrogen, or 392 grams of proteid, and this without adding very largely to the intake of non-nitrogenous matter. This experiment affords a striking illustration of the ability of the body to “fatten on nitrogen,” but it is very doubtful if such results can generally be obtained. Lüthje,[32] however, has reported a large retention of nitrogen on a diet containing 50 grams of nitrogen daily, with a fuel value of 4000 calories. It is more than probable that there existed in these particular cases some personal peculiarity or idiosyncrasy which favored the proteid-sparing power. The personal coefficient of nutrition is not to be ignored; it shows itself in many ways, and the above results are to be counted among those that are exceptional and not the rule. In the words of Magnus-Levy, “a given diet with Cassius may lead to different results than with Anthony.” [32] Zeitschrift für klinische Medizin, Band 44, p. 22.