Once again he was disappointed in the prominence given by the powerful
London press to his London enterprise. In the first newspaper, a very
important one, he positively could not find any criticism of the
Regent’s first night. There was nearly a page of the offensive Isabel
Joy, who was now appealing, through the newspapers, to the President of
the United States. Isabel had been christened the World-Circler, and
the special correspondents of the entire earth were gathered about her
carpeted cell. Hope still remained that she would reach London within
the hundred days. An unknown adherent of the cause for which she
suffered had promised to give ten thousand pounds to that cause if she
did so. Furthermore, she was receiving over sixty proposals of marriage
a day. And so on and so on! Most of this he gathered in an instant
from the headlines alone. Nauseating!
Another annoying item in the paper was a column and a half given to the
foundation-stone laying of the First New Thought Church, in Dean Street,
Soho--about a couple of hundred yards from its original site. He hated
the First New Thought Church as one always hates that to which one has
done an injury.
Then he found what he was searching for: "Regent Theatre. Production of
poetical drama at London’s latest playhouse." After all, it was well
situated in the paper, on quite an important page, and there was over a
column of it. But in his nervous excitation his eyes had missed it.
His eyes now read it. Over half of it was given to a discussion of the
Don Juan legend and the significance of the Byronic character of
Haidee--obviously written before the performance. A description of the
plot occupied most of the rest, and a reference to the acting ended it.
"Miss Rose Euclid in the trying and occasionally beautiful part of
Haidee was all that her admirers could have wished" ... "Miss Cunningham
distinguished herself by her diction and bearing in the small part of
the Messenger." The final words were: "The reception was quite
favourable."
"Quite favourable," indeed! Edward Henry had a chill. Good heavens,
was not the reception ecstatically, madly, foolishly enthusiastic?
"Why!" he exclaimed within, "I never saw such a reception!" It was
true; but then he had never seen any other first night. He was shocked,
as well as chilled. And for this reason: For weeks past all the
newspapers, in their dramatic gossip, had contained highly sympathetic
references to his enterprise. According to the paragraphs, he was a
wondrous man, and the theatre was a wondrous house, the best of all
possible theatres, and Carlo Trent was a great writer, and Rose Euclid
exactly as marvellous as she had been a quarter of a century before, and
the prospects of the intellectual-poetic drama in London so favourable
as to amount to a certainty of success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account