The Old DominionJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
General
The Old Dominion
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Southampton Insurrection, 1831 -- Fiction
I could easily conceive how such a letter, so designated, must have
affected my dear Bessy when first she saw it. What feelings of terror
and anguish, and hesitation, must have been produced in her mind when
she learned to believe that she was about to give herself, heart and
mind, and soul and body, to the son of one who had slain her own
father. My mind, though not light, was relieved; for I knew that, by
other proofs, I could show her the error easily; yet I wished to prove
it to her from the letter itself, to show her the villany which had
been perpetrated, and which I knew that letter, if thoroughly and
properly analyzed and scanned, must display in some part.
I accordingly turned to the very beginning again, and read it once
more, examining every word.
In the meantime, Bessy removed her hand from her eyes, weary of
waiting for my long examination. She fixed them on my face, however,
and not upon the letter, and at length she said, in a low and timid
tone,--
"Well, Richard, was not that enough to shake and terrify, and almost
drive me mad?"
"It was, my love," I answered, pressing her closely to me, "and I
grieve that a scoundrel should have had the power to inflict upon you
such pain. You shall suffer no more on this account, Bessy; but let me
go on and examine this paper more closely."
"Oh, it is certainly Mr. Harcourt's handwriting," replied Bessy.
"There are several more of his letters there, and I have got two or
three others. I know his writing quite well."
"I doubt it not," I answered; "yet there is a falsehood somewhere. Let
me examine farther, dear girl."
I read the first page, and part of the second, and then something
struck my eye which made me pause.
"Look here," dearest, I said. "This docket on the back tells you that
this is a letter describing the death of Colonel Davenport--your
father, I presume--by the hands of Sir Richard Conway, whom it points
out as _my_ father. The docket purports to have been written when I
was serving with a regiment in the presidency of Bombay. That is eight
years ago, Bessy; for I exchanged almost immediately after that
period, when I was merely a cornet, into a regiment in Bengal. Yet the
ink seems to me exceedingly fresh. I suspect that it has not been upon
the paper more than ten days. But now mark another thing. Look here at
this line; you see it stands thus: 'Davenport had been killed at the
first fire, and----' The line is almost full if you end with that word
'_and;_' but crowded in at the end of the line is the small word
'Sir,' and then, in the next line, come the words, 'Richard Conway.'
If you will remark closely the handwriting and the ink of that small
word, 'Sir,' you will perceive that the one is different and the other
bluer than those employed in the letter."
"I see, I see!" cried Bessy, eagerly. "It _is_ different; but what
object could be attained by adding that word?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account