The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
תנו רבנן סכין וממשמשין בבני מעיין בשבת ולוחשין לחישת נחשים ועקרבים בשבת
ומעבירין כלי על גב העין בשבת אמר רבן שמעון בן גמליאל במה דברים אמורים
בכלי הניטל אבל בכלי שאינו ניטל אסור ואין שואלין בדבר שדים בשבת ר׳ יוסי
אומר אף בחול אסור אמר רב הונא אין הלכה כר׳ יוסי ואף ר׳ יוסי לא אמרה אלא
משום סכנה כי הא דרב יצחק בר יוסף דאיבלע בארזא ואתעביד ליה ניסא פקע ארזא
ופלטיה ׃
“Our rabbies have handed down the tradition that it is lawful to anoint
and rub the stomach (of a sick man) on the Sabbath, also to charm
serpents and scorpions on the Sabbath: also to pass an instrument across
the eye on the Sabbath. R. Simeon, the son of Gamaliel, says, that this
only applies to an instrument which may be moved,[26] but with one that
may not be moved, it is unlawful. But it is unlawful on the Sabbath to
make inquiry of demons. R. Jose says, this is also unlawful on
week-days. Rav Huna says, the decision is not according to R. Jose: and
R. Jose himself said this only on account of danger, for that is what
occurred in the case of R. Isaac, the son of Joseph, who was swallowed
up in a cedar tree, but a miracle was wrought for him—the cedar opened
and cast him out.” (Sanhedrin, fol. 101, col. 1.) We have here, first,
the charming of serpents; we ask, then, could the Talmudic doctors
really believe in such folly or allow such wickedness on the Sabbath? Is
there any misunderstanding, or does the context show, that they were men
of that superstitious turn of mind to justify this idea? The context is
all of a piece, for after permitting the charming of serpents, it goes
on to discuss the lawfulness of asking counsel of demons, and here Rashi
shall explain what this means:—
בדבר שדים שכן עושין כשאובדין שום דבר שואלין במעשה שדים והם מגּידים להם
ואסור לעשות בשבת משום ממצוא חפציך ׃
“To make inquiry of demons, is what they do when any thing is lost. They
make inquiry by the work of demons, and they tell them, and this is
forbidden on the Sabbath, on account of the words, ‘Not finding thine
own pleasure.’ (Isaiah lviii. 13.)” This is plainly a magical operation,
but yet the rabbies do not say that it is unlawful because it is
magical, but because it would be attending to one’s own concerns. In
like manner, they say, it is unlawful on week-days, only on account of
the danger. And an instance is given in Rabbi Isaac of what might
happen; and here, again, we ask counsel of Rashi, in order to understand
what Rabbi Isaac was about. This commentator tells us:—
היה שואל במעשה שדים ובקש השד להזיקו ונעשה לו נס ובלעו הארז ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account