The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“And he believed in the LORD, and it was counted to him for
righteousness.” (Gen. xv. 6.) David the King did not expect to be
forgiven and justified on account of Abraham’s or his other ancestors’
merits; neither did he say, Blessed is the man who puts his trust in the
righteousness of the patriarchs, but—
אשרי נשוי פשע כסוי חטאה , אשרי אדם לא יחשב ה׳ לו עון ואין ברוחו רמיה ׃
“Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.
Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity, and in
whose spirit there is no guile.” (Ps. xxxii. 1.) Every one, then, who
desires to have this blessing, must renounce all pretensions to merit,
and acknowledge himself a sinner needing forgiveness; and for this
forgiveness he must look not to anything that man had done, or can do,
but to the mercy of God in passing by transgression and sin. And
therefore the Prophet Habakkuk lays it down as a general rule—
וצדיק באמונתו יהיה ׃
“The just shall live by his faith.” (Habak. ii. 4.) This is the
Scriptural mode of justification, and this the hope of Abraham, David,
and Habakkuk. Will the Jews, then, cast in their lot with their father
Abraham, and trust to that way of justification in which he walked? or
will they refuse to be justified as he was, and still persist in
following the inventions of men, which are not even consistent with
themselves? If the oral law pointed out one way of justification, and
then consistently adhered to it, there would at least be an appearance
of reason in following its directions. But it points out two ways as
opposite as east and west. It says a man may be justified by his own
merits, and then it tells him he is to be justified by the merits of
another. Both cannot possibly be true. It is the duty, then, of every
man earnestly to inquire which is the true way of Salvation, and to
decide, whether he is to be saved by his own merits, or the merits of
his forefathers, or the merits of “THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.”
Footnote 30:
Isaac.
Footnote 31:
“Alluding to Isaac’s being bound; and thus considered as if he had
been offered, and his body burnt to ashes on the altar.” (Levi’s
note.)
Footnote 32:
See the Machsor for the Day of Atonement, in אז מלפני בראשית and for
the Passover, in ברה דודי.
No. XXXVI.
DAY OF ATONEMENT.
The law and the prophets both abound with plain declarations entirely
subversive of the rabbinic doctrine of human merit. But it has pleased
God, besides these plain and repeated declarations, to ordain a public
and solemn act to instruct even the most ignorant, and to convince the
most obstinate, that by human merit there is no salvation. He commanded
that, once every year, an atonement should be made by the high-priest,
for himself, and for all the people of every class and degree.
וכפר את מקדש הקודש ואת אהל מועד ואת המזבח יכפר ועל הכהנים ועל כל עם הקהל
יכפר ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account