The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
It is, however, evident, that the rabbies themselves were dissatisfied
with their own assertion, for they immediately add to it a second, “That
the Day of Atonement itself atones for them that repent, as it is said,
‘For on that day he shall make an atonement for you.’” Notwithstanding
the confidence of their assertion about repentance, they did not feel
easy without some appearance of an atonement, and as they had no priest
and no victim, they say, that the day itself atones, and endeavour to
prove this assertion by a citation from Moses. But, unfortunately, this
citation entirely overthrows their assertion. Moses does not say:—
היום הזה יכפר עליכם ׃
“This day will atone for you,” but he says:—
ביום הזה יכפר עליכם ׃
“On that day he (the priest) shall atone for you.” Moses ascribes no
virtue whatever to the day itself, but only to the rites on that day to
be observed, and the person by whom they were performed. Moses
prescribes, first, a high-priest; Secondly, a goat, whose blood was
brought into the Holy of holies; and thirdly, a goat to be sent away: so
that where these three are wanting, nay, where any one of the three is
wanting, the conditions prescribed by Moses are not fulfilled, and there
is, therefore, no atonement. Without these three things the day itself
has no virtue, and is nothing different from the commonest day in the
year; and now, therefore, as they are all wanting, Israel has no
atonement. The assertion about the day itself, is a mere invention of
the rabbies, the only value of which is to show how deeply they felt the
insufficiency of repentance, and the necessity of a real atonement, in
order to procure remission of sins.
But the rabbies always betray themselves by adding something to make up
for the deficiency, of which they are sensible. We have seen this in
their assertion about merits, and so we find it here in their assertion
about atonement. They assert, that “The Day of Atonement itself atones
for the penitent,” but in spite of this, they have felt the need of
something more, which would a little better resemble real sacrificial
atonement; and hence has arisen the custom of sacrificing a cock on the
eve of that solemn day. The following account of this custom is given in
the קהלת שלמה, of which we have before us an edition published at
Breslau, so late as the year 1830; and it is selected, partly on account
of its recent publication, and partly because the directions how to act
are given in Jewish-German, which shows that they are intended even for
the most illiterate, and that the custom is not confined to a few
speculators, but is general amongst the people:—
סדר כפרות ׃
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account