The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
[i.e., in this world], and not tomorrow [_i.e._, in the world to
come].[33] To-day they are to be observed; but the reward is not to be
received to-day. The answer is, that God does not deal with his
creatures in a tyrannical manner. But why is this called an easy
commandment? Because it is not attended with any pecuniary loss.
Immediately every one of the Gentiles will hasten away, and make a
tabernacle on the roof of his house. But the Holy One, blessed be He,
will cause the sun to pierce them with an extraordinary heat at that
season, and then every one of them will kick down his tabernacle and go
forth,” &c. (Avodah Zarah, fol. 2, 3.) Such is the doctrine of the
Talmud, adopted, and therefore sealed with the most solemn sanction, by
the public worship of the synagogue. In the first place it is perfectly
false; it has not even the merit of plausibility. It is only astonishing
how an imagination so absurd should ever have found its way into the
prayers of Israel; and stranger still that the Jews of England should
suffer such a foul blot still to remain on their public services. It
certainly represents Judaism in the most unfavourable point of view, as
a religion of the grossest and most inconsistent superstition; and
proves, beyond all controversy, first, that the synagogue receives, as
of divine authority, even the fables of the Talmud; and, secondly, that
the authors of the oral law, who could either invent or believe so
absurd a statement, cannot be depended upon as faithful transmitters of
the religion of the prophets.
Further, it totally misrepresents the character of God. It describes
Him, first, as bearing witness to the obedience of Israel, whilst in His
Word he bears constant testimony to their disobedience. Here he is
represented also as calling upon heaven and earth to attest their
innocence and righteousness, whilst in His Word he calls upon them to be
the witnesses of their rebellion. “Hear, O heavens; and give ear, O
earth; for the Lord hath spoken: I have nourished and brought up
children, and they have rebelled against me.” (Isaiah i. 2.) And again,
“Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye
very desolate, saith the Lord. For my people have committed two evils;
they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out
cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.” (Jer. ii. 12.) These
passages of the word of God are directly opposed to the above statement
of the oral law. But farther, it misrepresents the Divine Being as an
unmerciful and unjust judge, who pretends to give the guilty Gentiles
another and easy trial by giving them the commandment respecting the
tabernacles, and then employs his omnipotence so to plague them with the
heat of the sun, as to render it impossible for them to yield obedience.
Such a representation is altogether unworthy of the Judge of all the
earth, who will deal justly by the Gentiles as well as the Jews.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account