The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of
face” (Dan. ix. 7), where it is impossible to say that “Almsgiving
belongeth unto the Lord.” The oral law is therefore guilty of perverting
the meaning of one of the plainest and most commonly repeated words in
the Bible, and of course of thereby giving an erroneous sense to the
passage where it occurs. Thus it says, as we have seen above, “that by
almsgiving the throne of Israel is established and the law of truth
standeth,” and it proves this assertion by referring to a verse of
Isaiah, where the word צדקה occurs, and which signifies “by
righteousness shalt thou be established,” but which it perverts to mean
“by almsgiving thou shalt be established.” Here then the oral law is
plainly convicted of falsifying the Word of God, and perverting its
meaning in order to serve its own purposes and favour its own false
doctrine. To teach false doctrine is bad enough, but to pervert the
plain sense of Scripture is a great deal worse. Either charge, if
proved, would be sufficient to prove that the oral law is a false
religion, but here both charges are proved together. The oral law here
teaches that almsgiving can do that which it cannot do, namely, bribe
God to have mercy; and it supports its false doctrine by interpreting
צדקה to signify “almsgiving,” whereas it plainly signifies
“righteousness.” A religion guilty of such error cannot be from God. It
is for the Jews, then, to consider whether they will persist in
upholding the truth of a system which opposes the doctrines of Moses and
the prophets, and perverts the Word of God. The great boast of the Jews
is, that they are faithful to Moses and to the religion of Moses: but
this boast is vain so long as they profess Judaism. If Moses were to
rise from the dead, and get the oral law into his hands, he would not be
able to recognise it as the religion which he left to Israel. And, as to
the commands about almsgiving, he would not be able even to translate
them, for in his time צדקה signified righteousness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account