The animal remains, though less numerous, are more interesting. They
are identical with those of the Den of Balruddery. I saw, in the
possession of the superintendent of the quarries, a well-preserved
head of the _Cephalaspis Lyellii_. The crescent-shaped horns were
wanting, and the outline a little obscure; but the eyes were better
marked than in almost any other specimen I have yet seen, and the
circular star-like tubercles which roughen the large occipital
buckler, to which the creature owes its name, were tolerably well
defined. I was shown the head of another individual of the same
species in the centre of a large slab, and nothing could be more
entire than the outline. The osseous plate still retained the
original brownish-white hue of the bone, and its radiated porous
texture; and the sharp crescent-shaped horns were as sharply defined
as during the lifetime of the strangely organized creature which they
had defended. In both specimens the thin angular body was wanting.
Like almost all the other fish of the Old Red Sandstone, the bony
skeleton of the _Cephalaspis_ was external--as much so as the shell
of the crab or lobster: it presented at all points an armor of bone,
as complete as if it had been carved by the ivory-turner out of a
solid block; while the internal skeleton, which in every instance
has disappeared, seems to have been composed of cartilage. I have
compared its general appearance to a saddler's cutting-knife;--I
should, perhaps, have said a saddler's cutting-knife divested of
the wooden handle--the broad, bony head representing the blade, and
the thin angular body the iron stem usually fixed in the wood. No
existence of the present creation at all resembles the _Cephalaspis_.
Were we introduced to the living creatures which now inhabit the
oceans and rivers of Mars and Venus, we could find nothing among them
more strange in appearance, or more unlike our living acquaintances
of the friths and streams, than the _Cephalaspides_ of Carmylie.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account