In what could this increase in bulk have originated? Is there a high
but yet comparatively medium temperature in which animals attain
their greatest size, and corresponding gradations of descent on
both sides, whether we increase the heat until we reach the point
at which life can no longer exist, or diminish it until we arrive
at the same result from intensity of cold? The line of existence
bisects on both sides the line of extinction. May it not probably
form a curve, descending equally from an elevated centre to the
points of bisection on the level of death? But whatever may have
been the cause, the change furnishes another instance of analogy
between the progress of individuals and of orders. The shark and
the sword-fish begin to exist as little creatures of a span in
length; they expand into monsters whose bodies equal in hugeness
the trunks of ancient oaks; and thus has it been with the order to
which they belong. The teeth, spines, and palatal bones of the fish
of the Upper Ludlow Rocks are of almost microscopic minuteness; an
invariable mediocrity of dimension characterizes the ichthyolites
of the Lower Old Red Sandstone; a marked increase in size takes
place among the existences of the middle formation; in the upper the
bulky _Holoptychius_ appears; the close of the system ushers in the
still bulkier Megalichthys; and low in the Coal Measures we find the
ponderous bones, buckler-like scales, and enormous teeth of another
and immensely more gigantic _Holoptychius_--a creature pronounced
by Agassiz the largest of all osseous fish.[BF] We begin with an
age of dwarfs--we end with an age of giants. The march of Nature
is an onward and an ascending march; the stages are slow, but the
tread is stately; and to Him who has commanded, and who overlooks
it, a thousand years are as but a single day, and a single day as a
thousand years.[BG]
[Footnote BF: There have been fish scales found in Burdie House
five inches in length, by rather more than four in breadth. Of the
gigantic _Holoptychius_ of this deposit we have still much to learn.
The fragment of a jaw, in the possession of the Royal Society of
Edinburgh, which belonged to an individual of the species, is 18½
inches in length; and it is furnished with teeth, one of which, from
base to point, measures five inches, and another four and a half.]
[Footnote BG: See, on this subject, the introductory note to the
present edition, and note p. 154.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account