The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Of course there is no statement to the effect that Pharaoh was killed with
his army by the returning flood after the Israelites crossed the Red Sea
(in Ps. cxxxvi. 15 he must be regarded as having been overwhelmed therein
in the persons of his warriors, who suffered the fate which ought to have
stricken also the king), so that little or no difficulty exists in this
portion of the narrative.(77) On the other hand, a difficulty is got rid
of if we suppose that the Exodus took place in the time of Rameses II. Dr.
Mahler points out, that Meneptah was succeeded by his son and heir,
User-kheperu-Ra’, who did not die, but reigned thirty-three years. The
eldest sons of Rameses II., on the other hand, all died during their
father’s lifetime, and it was the fourteenth of his numerous progeny who
ultimately came to the throne.
Dr. Mahler clinches the matter by making the plague of darkness to have
been a solar eclipse.
Whatever may be the defects of Dr. Mahler’s seductive theory, it must be
admitted that it presents fewer difficulties than any other that has yet
been put forward, and on that account deserves special attention.
CHAPTER IX. THE NATIONS WITH WHOM THE ISRAELITES CAME INTO CONTACT.
The Amorites—The Hittites—The Jebusites—The Girgashites—Moab.
Amorites.
The earliest mention of the Amorites in the Old Testament is the passage
in Gen. x. 16, where the name occurs along with that of the Jebusites and
the Girgashites, from which may be gathered that they were all three very
powerful tribes, though their power is in all probability not to be
measured by the order of their names, the most important of the three
being the Amorites, whose name comes second. They were regarded by the
ancient Jews as an iniquitous and wicked people (Gen. xv. 6; 2 Kings xxi.
11), though they may not, in reality, have been worse than other nations
which were their contemporaries. That they were a powerful nation is
implied by the statement in Gen. xlviii. 22, where Jacob speaks of the
tract which he had taken out of the hand of the Amorite with his sword and
his bow, as a feat of which a warrior might be proud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account