The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Having arranged things to his satisfaction in Babylonia, Tiglath-pileser
turned his attention to the East (Namri, 744), Ararat (743), and Arpad
(same year), the last being his objective up to and including the year 740
B.C. Sardurri of Ararat, however, saw his influence threatened by this
move, for he, too, was a conqueror, and had had such success, that he felt
justified in calling himself “king of Suri,” or North Syria. How matters
fell out is not known, but it may be supposed that the Assyrian king went
and besieged Arpad, was attacked whilst doing so by Sardurri and his
allies, and compelled to raise the siege. A pursuit of the Armenian forces
by the Assyrians was the result of this attack, the end being, in all
probability, a decisive victory for Tiglath-pileser. This, according to
Rost, would seem to be the most reasonable supposition, for the Assyrian
king was able to besiege Arpad again next year without any hindrance. The
capture of the city in the third year brought the rulers of the district
in which it stood to the feet of the Assyrian king—all except one, Tutamû
king of Unqu, who was defeated and captured, and his territories annexed
to Assyria.
During the campaigns in the north at the end of 739 B.C., risings took
place in Syria and North Phœnicia, and this gave Tiglath-pileser the
wished-for opportunity to bring these districts again under his sway. The
Eponym Canon gives for this year the simple entry, “He captured the city
of Kullanû,” which Rost supposes to have been in the neighbourhood of
Hamath, and if so, must be the Calne of Isaiah x. 9, which is there
mentioned with Hamath, Carchemish, Arpad, Samaria, and Damascus as having
been subdued by Assyria. The mention of Kullanû as the object of the
expedition is probably due to its having been one of the chief factors in
the disturbances which took place. It would also seem that Azariah of
Judah took part in the attempt to get rid of Assyrian influence, and
though this was fully recognized by Tiglath-pileser, the Assyrian king to
all appearance did not come into direct contact with his country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account