The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Unfortunately, but few inscriptions of Nabopolassar have been found, and
of them some are duplicates, and all refer to his architectural or
engineering works. The principal treats of his restoration of the temple
Ê-temen-ana-kia, the shrine at Ê-sagila, which the Babylonians regarded as
the Tower of Babel. It is written in the archaic style of writing much
affected by his son Nebuchadnezzar, and has certain peculiarities of
spelling. Like most of the pious architectural inscriptions of Babylonia,
there is no reference to historical events, but the king speaks of
Nabium-kudurra-uṣur (Nebuchadrezzar), “the eldest, firstborn, and beloved
of my heart,” and his younger brother, Nabû-šumam-lìšir. Both the king and
his two sons took part in the restoration of the temple, bringing with
their own hands material for the work, the younger son also assisting by
pulling the cord of the cart which carried it. The receptacles which they
used to carry the material were made of gold and silver. Other
inscriptions of this king refer to the digging out of the canal of the
Euphrates near the city Sippara, and to Nabopolassar’s restoration of the
temple of “the Lady of Sippar,” called Ê-edinna, “the house (temple) of
the plain,” or “of Edina,” _i.e._ Eden.
When Nebuchadnezzar (in Babylonian Nabû-kudurri-uṣur—he was the second of
the name) came to the throne, he found himself in possession of a mighty
kingdom, consolidated by his father’s talent, and he could himself boast
of having had a hand in its enlargement and greater security. Everything
was, to all appearance, at peace, and the new king had no reason to fear
either a pretender to the throne, or the advent of enemies from without.
One of his tributaries, namely, Jehoiakim, king of Judah, after paying
tribute three years (604-602 B.C.), rebelled, but was again reduced to
subjection (2 Kings xxiv. 1 ff.).
Later, however, uprisings of a more earnest nature came to the ears of the
Babylonian king, constraining him to act. Apparently in consequence of the
promises of Egypt, Jehoiachin, son of Jehoiakim, brought against himself
the hostility of the king of Babylon, who sent an army to besiege
Jerusalem, afterwards journeying thither himself, the result being, that
the city was taken, and the Jewish king, with his court, yielded, and were
carried away to Babylon (598 B.C.). The number of captives on this
occasion exceeded 10,000, and the treasures of the palace and the Temple
formed part of the spoils sent to Babylon. The country was not annexed,
however, for Nebuchadnezzar made Mattaniah king of Judah instead of
Jehoiachin, changing his name to Zedekiah.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account