The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Until about the time of the dynasty of Babylon, the language principally
used was to all appearance the non-Semitic Babylonian or Akkadian—in any
case, the numerous texts (mainly temple-accounts) of the period of Dungi,
Bûr-Sin, Gimil-Sin, and Ibi-Sin are written in that tongue. Nevertheless,
Akkadian seems to have been the official language of the country for a
considerable time after, if we may judge from the contracts, and
especially the historical dates of these documents, which are always
written in Akkadian. The names, too, which were before this period wholly
Akkadian, gradually become more and more Semitic (Assyro-Babylonian), and
finally the Akkadian element only exists as a remnant of the non-Semitic
tongue which prevailed before the Semitic Dynasty of Babylon—that to which
Ḫammurabi or Amraphel belonged—made the Semitic tongue, spoken by Sargon
of Agadé more than 1500 years before, the official language of the
country.
Such, then, is the history of the ancient Akkadians, from whose
intermingled stock the later Semitic Babylonians sprang, and who
inherited, at the same time, their method of writing, their literature,
their arts and sciences, and also, to a great extent, their manners,
customs, and religion. It was to all appearance with the Semitic dynasty
of Ḫammurabi that the change from non-Semitic to Semitic predominance took
place. This change must have been slow enough, and in all probability it
occurred without any national upheaval, and without any interruption of
the national life. Semitic names gradually replaced the Akkadian ones,
most of the religious works, incantations, national histories, bilingual
lists, and syllabaries were supplied with Semitic translations, and legal
precedents in Semitic Babylonian for the information of the judges of
later times were drawn up, whilst the old Akkadian laws, though retained,
were translated for the use of students who no longer learned Akkadian as
their mother-tongue, and who committed them to memory at the same time as
they learned the set phrases they would have to use when, their education
completed, they should attain to the dignity of full-fledged ministers to
the legal needs of the community. By this time, or somewhat later, the
racial type must have become fixed, for the sculptures from the thirteenth
century B.C. downwards no longer show the slim, elegant form of the
Akkadians, but the thick-set, well-developed figure of the Semites, such
as at least some of the native Christians of Baghdad and the neighbourhood
show at the present day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account