The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper CorrespondentBriggs, Emily Edson
History
The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper Correspondent
Briggs, Emily Edson
United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1933; Washington (D.C.) -- History
Whither are we drifting, in a social, republican point of view,
when a Senator’s wife tosses her head and says: “Would you think it
possible that the wife of a member has had the impertinence to ask
me to come and spend an evening socially with her?” To a spectator,
looking on this small society side-show, it seems all the more
ridiculous, as the Senator-husband is so small that he is scarcely
ever heard of either in the country or the Senate, whilst the member
in dispute has a fame like the flag of our country.
To a neat little volume, called “Philip’s Washington Described,”
we are indebted for a copy of the “Rules” as laid down by General
Washington, as well as the “Code,” which was meant to be a new
edition of the “Rules,” revised and corrected.
OLIVIA.
GENERAL PHIL SHERIDAN.
THE HANDSOME WARRIOR GRACES THE SPEAKER’S RECEPTION.
WASHINGTON, _February 14, 1870_.
Never since the inauguration of our Republic has social life in
Washington assumed such brilliant hues as during the present winter.
With the departure of the Democratic dynasty, and the disappearance
of the Southern queens of society, it has been thought that the
sunshine of the “Republican court” would go out forever. But the
extravagant magnificence of to-day eclipses all former years; and if
Mrs. Slidell or Mrs. Crittenden should revisit the haunts of their
former triumphs they would find the social kingdom in stronger hands
than their own. If the Southern woman ruled as queen, the haughty
Northerner sways the sceptre of an empress. The Southern queen
pointed to her slaves; the empress of to-day wears a coronet of
diamonds, and only death can set her bondmen free.
Reception, ball, dinner, sociable--which shall be described first?
The Prince’s ball darted across the social sky like a meteor. It has
come and gone, and Washington’s fashionable women still survive. The
New York _Tribune_ says that one young lady refused to dance with the
Prince because she invariably declined all round-dances. Then she
refused to be his partner in a quadrille, because it would keep dear
papa and mama later than they had decided to stay. All this sounds
very nice in the newspapers, only it is a pretty fib and counterfeit
and should never pass for the genuine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account