The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper CorrespondentBriggs, Emily Edson
History
The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper Correspondent
Briggs, Emily Edson
United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1933; Washington (D.C.) -- History
“I shall have to refer you to Mr. Disraeli. I know that to have been
a very happy marriage. I met Mr. Disraeli and his wife at Munich,
when they were on their wedding tour. At the principal hotel we met
at the breakfast table. Mr. Disraeli sat by the side of his newly
made wife. He might have been, or at least looked, about 30 years
old. His intensely black hair smoothed to perfection. At that time
he had become famous as an author. Everything seemed noticeably new
about him. Mrs. Disraeli appeared like a kind-hearted, middle-aged
English woman, and Disraeli seemed the one to carry the idea that he
had drawn the prize. Time has shown how devoted they were to each
other. In the last few months we hear of his walking by her side and
supporting her tenderly. She must have been nearly, if not quite,
80. In my opinion Disraeli is one of the most remarkable men of this
age when we remember the obstacles he had to overcome to reach the
position he occupies in England. The prejudice which exists there
against his Jewish faith alone is enough to chill the most ambitious.”
A book was drawn from a side table which had been printed in 1460.
It was in the German language, and, with one exception, it is as
perfect as a book published yesterday. Its binding would shame our
best modern work.
“This,” said the man in gray, “reminds me of a conversation I once
had with Macaulay, as well as an incident of my school-boy days. The
master once said to the scholars, ‘Can any of you tell me in which
year printing was invented?’ No answer. ‘Remember, children, it was
the year which contains the figure 4 three times.’ The small brains
were greatly puzzled. At last one little fellow answers ‘1444’. When
I grew older I tried to ascertain the proof of this; but I have
never been able to find which year printing was invented. It was
somewhere about 1450, and, from all I can learn, I am inclined at
times to think the Dutch instead of the Germans made this discovery.
I remember a long talk I had with Macaulay on this subject. I
was on the side of the Dutch; he was for the Germans. At last he
proposed that we should adjourn to the British Museum and search the
authorities, and have this weighty matter decided. I did not go,
but I have always regretted it. We all remember Macaulay’s Essay on
Milton. I think it ranks with the best of his writings; yet he told
me that he regretted nothing so much as its publication; and this
proves the incompetency of authors to judge their own works.”
We spoke about the changing seasons of human life, and the writer
asked the statesman a question which lies very near to every woman’s
soul.
“Is beauty confined to one period of our existence? Infancy and
childhood are only promises; the summer is something more; but give
me the golden reality of October or the bracing chill of a December
landscape if the intellectual powers are not on the wane.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account