The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper CorrespondentBriggs, Emily Edson
History
The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper Correspondent
Briggs, Emily Edson
United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1933; Washington (D.C.) -- History
The hour having arrived for the opening of the last evening’s
session, and the great lights not appearing on the stage, it was
moved by Professor Wilcox and seconded that Mrs. Joseph Griffing be
chosen temporarily to occupy the chair. The Hon. James M. Scovel, of
New Jersey, was asked to speak, and immediately began. He said it was
the coming question whether women shall have the ballot. He believed
the thing is right. His mother had said when she went to a village
and saw men coming out of a house she knew that to be a tavern;
when she saw women going in she knew that to be a church. It is not
flattery that women want; it is their rights. The time had been in
Jersey when women had no more rights than lunatics and idiots, and it
was not much better to-day. He didn’t come there to make a speech; he
came there a convert. We shall have no peace until women can go side
by side with men to the ballot-box. At this point Mr. Scovel retired,
having proved to the rather slim audience that “stump speaking” was
an accomplishment that sometimes made its escape from Jersey.
Again the irrepressible Wilcox appeared and read a letter which
he had received from the wife of O’Donovan Rossa, in answer to
his polite invitation to be present at the meeting. Madame Rossa
regretted that unavoidable departure from the country prevented her
attendance. She also added some nice things about liberty and her
good wishes for the speedy advancement of the cause.
Just as the letter was concluded, Mrs. Stanton swept upon the
stage, followed by the planets in her train. She came forward and
introduced Mrs. Wilbour, of New York. Mrs. Wilbour, stately in black
velvet, point applique, and diamonds, came forward and read a rather
prosy, dry essay. Mrs. Wilbour has a voice for public speaking
superior to most of her sex. She varied the old question by asking
for human rights instead of woman’s rights. She said it is urged that
woman has less force than man, and therefore, should not exercise
this inalienable right. She asked what should rule--force power or
beauty power? Brain not brawn rules this world. A small white hand
can move an engine, or wield a pen, an instrument stronger than the
sword. All that gives harmony to the world is the beautiful. Religion
beautifies the soul. A preponderance of beauty is on the feminine
side, but force is found on the masculine. Mrs. Wilbour talked about
the ballot as a little slip of paper. She might as well have spent
her strength on the paper wadding instead of the deadly bullet that
follows it. After a time the sleepy essay came to an end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account