The Ordeal of Richard Feverel: A History of a Father and SonMeredith, George
General
The Ordeal of Richard Feverel: A History of a Father and Son
Meredith, George
Domestic fiction; England -- Fiction; Fathers and sons -- Fiction
"And depend upon it," he added, "that, until fathers act thoroughly
up to their duty, we shall see the sights we see in great cities,
and hear the tales we hear in little villages, with death and
calamity in our homes, and a legacy of sorrow and shame to the
generations to come. I do aver," he exclaimed, becoming excited,
"that, if it were not for the duty to my son, and the hope I cherish
in him, I, seeing the accumulation of misery we are handing down to
an innocent posterity--to whom, through our sin, the fresh breath of
life will be foul--I--yes! I would hide my name! For whither are we
tending? What home is pure absolutely? What cannot our doctors and
lawyers tell us?"
Mr. Thompson acquiesced significantly.
"And what is to come of this?" Sir Austin continued. "When the sins
of the fathers are multiplied by the sons, is not perdition the
final sum of things? And is not life, the boon of heaven, growing to
be the devil's game utterly? But for my son, I would hide my name. I
would not bequeath it to be cursed by them that walk above my
grave!"
This was indeed a terrible view of existence. Mr. Thompson felt
uneasy. There was a dignity in his client, an impressiveness in his
speech, that silenced remonstrating reason and the cry of long years
of comfortable respectability. Mr. Thompson went to church
regularly; paid his rates and dues without overmuch, or at least
more than common, grumbling. On the surface he was a good citizen,
fond of his children, faithful to his wife, devoutly marching to a
fair seat in heaven on a path paved by something better than a
thousand a year. But here was a man sighting him from below the
surface, and though it was an unfair, unaccustomed, not to say
un-English, method of regarding one's fellow-man, Mr. Thompson was
troubled by it. What though his client exaggerated? Facts were at
the bottom of what he said. And he was acute--he had unmasked
Ripton! Since Ripton's exposure he winced at a personal application
in the text his client preached from. Possibly this was the secret
source of part of his anger against that peccant youth.
Mr. Thompson shook his head, and, with dolefully puckered visage and
a pitiable contraction of his shoulders, rose slowly up from his
chair. Apparently he was about to speak, but he straightway turned
and went meditatively to a side-recess in the room, whereof he
opened a door, drew forth a tray and a decanter labelled PORT,
filled a glass for his client, deferentially invited him to partake
of it; filled another glass for himself, and drank.
That was his reply.
Sir Austin never took wine before dinner. Thompson had looked as if
he meant to speak: he waited for Thompson's words.
Mr. Thompson saw that, as his client did not join him in his glass,
the eloquence of that Porty reply was lost on his client.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account