The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and CountriesBerdoe, Edward
History
The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and Countries
Berdoe, Edward
Medicine -- History
Ancient authorities differ as to the respective order in which the
schools of the Asclepiads should be esteemed. Rhodes, Cos, and Cnidos
continually disputed for the pre-eminence, Cos and Cnidos acquiring
great fame by their conflicting opinions. According to Galen, the
first place must be conceded to Cos, as having produced the greatest
number of excellent disciples, amongst whom was Hippocrates; he ranks
Cnidos next. Cos (B.C. 600) was the objective school, and devoted its
studies chiefly to symptomatology. It asked, what can we see of the
patient’s disorder? of what does he complain? what, in fact, are his
symptoms? This is practical medicine, though not so much in accordance
with modern scientific medicine as the method of Cnidos, the subjective
school. There the aim was to make a correct diagnosis; to find out what
was behind the symptoms, what caused the morbid appearances; what it
was that the sensations of the patient indicated; and its aim was not
to treat symptoms so much as to treat vigorously the disorder which
caused them. Auscultation, or the art of scientifically listening
to the sounds of the chest, those of the lungs in breathing, and of
the heart in beating, was to some extent understood and practised at
Cnidos. The medical school of Crotona was in the highest repute 500
B.C., probably on account of its connection with the Pythagoreans. The
school of Rhodes does not seem to have had a long life.
That of Cyrene was famous on account not only of its medical
teaching, but from the fact that mathematics and philosophy were
industriously pursued there. The teaching in all these schools must
have been of a very high order; for, though unfortunately little of
it has descended directly to us, we have sufficient evidence of its
importance in such fragments as are to be found incorporated with the
works of Hippocrates, such as the _Coan Prognostics_ and the _Cnidian
Sentences_; the former, a miscellaneous collection of the observations
made by the physician of Cos, and the latter, a work attributed to
Euryphon, a celebrated physician of Cnidos (about the former half of
the fifth century B.C.).
Experiment and observation were insisted upon in the study of anatomy
and physiology. Galen tells us in his second book, _On Anatomical
Manipulations_: “I do not blame the ancients, who did not write books
on anatomical manipulations; though I praise Marinus, who did. For
it was superfluous for them to compose such records for themselves
or others, while they were, from their childhood, exercised by their
parents in dissecting, just as familiarly as in writing and reading;
so that there was no more fear of their forgetting their anatomy than
of their forgetting their alphabet. But when grown men, as well as
children, were taught, this thorough discipline fell off; and, the art
being carried out of the family of the Asclepiads, and declining by
repeated transmission, books became necessary for the student.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account