The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and CountriesBerdoe, Edward
History
The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and Countries
Berdoe, Edward
Medicine -- History
who had travelled widely and acquired vast information from distant
sources. The history manufactured for him is plainly an imitation from
that of our Lord, concocted by persons interested in degrading the
character of Christ.[487]
PLINY THE ELDER (23-79 A.D.), the author of the immense encyclopædic
work, his famous _Natural History_, was not a man of genius, nor even
an original observer, his work is but a compilation, and contains
more falsehood than fact, and more absurdities than either. He cannot
be called a naturalist, though he wrote on natural history; nor a
physician, though he wrote of diseases and their remedies. His work is
valuable chiefly as a picture of the general knowledge of his time. The
following is an example of the medical lore of the period. Pliny says
that a woman dreamt that some one was directed to send to her son, a
soldier in Spain, some roots of the dog-rose. It happened that exactly
at that time her son had been bitten by a mad dog, and had received a
letter from his mother, who had dreamt about him, and she begged him to
use these roots as she directed. He did so, and was “protected” from
hydrophobia, as were many others of his friends who adopted the same
treatment. Thus it was that the wild-rose was called the dog-rose.
DIOSCORIDES lived in the first or second century of our era. He was
a physician who rendered greater services than any other to Materia
Medica. His work on this subject was the result of immense labour and
research, and remained for ages the standard authority; it contained
a description of everything used in medicine, and is a most valuable
document for the historian of the healing art of the period. Galen
highly valued the work of Dioscorides, which must have been of the
greatest use to the doctors of the time, who were obliged to prepare
their own medicines. Drugs were so much adulterated that it was unsafe
to procure them from the stores in Rome.
MARINUS was a famous anatomist, who lived in the first and second
centuries after Christ. Galen’s tutor Quintus was one of his pupils. He
wrote many works on anatomy, which Galen abridged and praised, saying
that he was one of the restorers of anatomical science.
QUINTUS, an eminent Roman physician of the second century, was a pupil
of Marinus. He was celebrated for his knowledge of anatomy.
ZENON lived in the fourth century, and taught medicine at Alexandria.
Julian (A.D. 361 _circ._) wrote in very high terms of the medical skill
of this physician.
MAGNUS OF ALEXANDRIA was a pupil of the above, who lectured on medicine
at Alexandria, where he was very famous. He wrote a work on the urine.
IONICUS OF SARDIS studied under Zenon. He was not only distinguished
in all branches of medicine, but was versed in rhetoric, logic, and
poetry.
THEON OF ALEXANDRIA, of very uncertain period, probably in the fourth
century after Christ, wrote a celebrated book on _Man_, in which he
treated of diseases in a systematic order, and also of pharmacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account