The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and CountriesBerdoe, Edward
History
The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and Countries
Berdoe, Edward
Medicine -- History
The principle of authority was paramount in Egyptian medicine. So long
as the doctor faithfully followed the instructions of the ancient
exponents of his art, he could do as he liked with his patient; but if
he struck out a path for himself, and his patient unhappily died, he
forfeited his own life. Diodorus Siculus leads us to suppose that the
physicians formed their diagnosis according to the position occupied
by the patient in his bed. This is singularly like the method of
diagnosing diseases in use amongst the ancient Hindus. Medicine in
Egypt, after all, was only an art; the absurd reverence for authority
prevented any real progress. Kept back by these fixed regulations, its
freedom was restricted on every side; otherwise, with the unbounded
facility for making post-mortem examinations, Egyptian medicine would
have made immense advance.
Concerning the specialism which prevailed amongst Egyptian doctors,
Herodotus says: “The art of medicine is thus divided amongst them:
each physician applies himself to one disease only, and not more. All
places abound in physicians; some physicians are for the eyes, others
for the head, others for the teeth, others for the parts about the
belly, and others for internal disorders.”[136]
With reference to the teeth, it is interesting to observe that some of
the dental work found in opening mummies is equal to our own.
Sir J. Wilkinson says[137] that the embalmers were probably members
of the medical profession as well as of the class of priests. Pliny
states that, during this process, certain examinations took place,
which enabled them to study the disease of which the patient had died.
They appear to have been made in compliance with an order from the
government,[138] as he says the kings of Egypt had the bodies opened
after death to ascertain the nature of their diseases, by which means
alone the remedy for phthisical complaints was discovered. Indeed,
it is reasonable to suppose that a people so advanced as were the
Egyptians in knowledge of all kinds, and whose medical art was so
systematically arranged that they had regulated it by some of the
very same laws followed by the most enlightened and skilful nations
of the present day, would not have omitted so useful an inquiry, or
have failed to avail themselves of the means which the process adopted
for embalming the body placed at their disposal. And nothing can more
clearly prove their advancement in the study of human diseases than
the fact of their assigning to each his own peculiar branch, under the
different heads of oculists, dentists, those who cured diseases in the
head, those who confined themselves to intestinal complaints, and those
who attended to secret and internal maladies. They must have possessed
an intimate knowledge of drugs, to have enabled them to select those of
an antiseptic character suitable for the preservation of the mummies.
That their practical knowledge of anatomy must have been considerable
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account