The Origin of Metallic Currency and Weight StandardsRidgeway, William
History
The Origin of Metallic Currency and Weight Standards
Ridgeway, William
Money -- Origin; Weights and measures -- History
of the Bisaltian silver mines that in the time preceding and immediately
posterior to the Persian invasion silver was exceedingly abundant in
all that region. It is then by no means unlikely that it required ten
silver pieces of 220 grs. each to make the equivalent of one gold unit
of 130 grs. With the exhaustion of the silver mines, and perhaps a
greater output of gold, silver became dearer, and consequently 10 silver
pieces of 170 grs. each were now equal to a gold stater. Abdera on the
coast would come perfectly within the sphere of such changed conditions,
and her standard would consequently likewise undergo modification.
With Philip’s accession, fresh conquests and a general development of
resources may have temporarily thrown more silver on the market, thus
inducing him to revert to the 220 grs. standard, but the exploiting of
the famous mines of Crenides increased the supply of gold to such an
extent that by the time Alexander mounted his fathers throne gold stood
to silver in the relation of 10:1, and it was found extremely convenient
to coin this on the same footing as gold, 10 silver pieces of 135 grs.
being exactly equal to the gold stater of like weight. A like explanation
applies to the coinage of Thrace. Amongst the Thracian tribes who dwelt
near Mount Pangaeum and worked the gold and silver mines of that region
the art of coining had been known from the 6th century B.C. and they
issued silver coins of about 160 grs. This is regarded by some as debased
Babylonian or Persic standard. But it is far more rational to suppose
that in that region gold was more plentiful in proportion to silver than
it was at that time further west in Macedonia, and accordingly a certain
number of silver didrachms of 160 grs. were found to represent the gold
stater or ox-unit. It seems most unlikely that a people long acquainted
with both gold and silver could not devise for themselves a simple
method of making some convenient number of silver pieces be equivalent
to one gold, and that, on the contrary, having once obtained a certain
standard fixed for silver in Asia Minor, at a time when gold was to
silver as 13:1, they would blindly cleave to this standard, no matter
how great a change took place in the relation of the metals. In face
of the statements of Xenophon and Polybius already quoted and the fact
that Solon deliberately constructed a new silver standard, it is simply
impossible to believe such a doctrine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account