Whilst the _Theorists_ take the predicate of God, when applied even to
a fetish, as requiring no explanation, the _Historical School_ sees in
it the result of a long continued evolution of thought. It was evident
that the human soul was so constituted that it must tend naturally and
inevitably towards the Unknown; it was also necessary that man should
learn that he possessed a soul.
We recognise that we have one; but are we equally clear as to what it
is?
We answer perhaps: “Yes, it is that part of us which is not the body
which perishes--the soul is immortal.” It is well to be able to make
such a reply, since it is true; our catechisms have sown the seed of
which this is the result.
But since all human knowledge, whether abstract or practical, has the
same beginning, through the senses, and that neither eye, ear, nor hand
has to do with the soul, what can we know of it? Above all, what can
we learn of its existence after death, the time when immortality has
passed beyond the sphere of the experience of the senses? As man we
recognise the spirit inhabiting the body, but with no form, such as it
might receive after death; we can hardly clothe these ideas in words.
This belief in a soul, exactly like the belief in gods, and at last in
One God, can only be understood as the outcome of constantly renewed
observations and long meditations; the annals of language furnish
material for this study, those ancient words, which, meaning originally
something quite tangible and visible, came in time to mean that which
is invisible and infinite.
The last breath of a dying person gave the first conception of the
presence in man of a non-corporeal principle; it was recognised that
this perceptible breath, at the moment of death, was an accident and
transient. Language marks clearly the difference between the act of
breathing or breath, and that which breathed, the invisible agent of
this act--the living soul, the spirit. This agent received different
names, in the different languages; the Greeks named it Psyche, saying
that it was the breath which, at the hour of death, passed out through
the bars of the teeth; amongst the Hindoos it was called _Atman_, and
_Anima_ amongst the Latins, two words which originally were understood
by those using them as meaning something breathing. Cicero spoke of
_Anima_, but he refrained from defining it, and frankly avowed that he
did not know whether to call it breath or fire.
The word breath has been used figuratively to express the Power
governing the world.[111] A poet in the Veda when speaking of the
Supreme Being says, “It breathed without air.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account