Many explanations have been sought to account in a rational manner for
these strange tales; writers have striven to discover what can have
given rise to such ridiculous inventions; some have asserted that it
was the intention of the authors of mythology to convey to the people a
knowledge of certain facts of nature, and certain moral truths whilst
clothing them in allegorical form, and by endowing the divinities with
certain virtues which it would become men to imitate and acquire; and
that the worship of these divinities was instituted that man might be
more fully impressed, that the likeness of the virtues upheld might
be more deeply engraved in the heart of the pious worshipper. Zeus,
was mind; Athene, art; Hercules, energy and perseverance in labours of
great difficulty; whilst the Homeric heroes, Agamemnon, Achilles, and
Hector represented physical activities. According to another theory the
object with which the myths were composed was political, the laws of
government were supposed to emanate from the gods; and whoso refused
to recognise the excellence of the institutions of the country was
held to be in revolt against the gods themselves. The philosopher
Euhemerus was the author of a third theory, called the historical; he
represented the mythological personages not as gods, but as kings,
heroes, and philosophers, who, after their death, had received divine
honours among their fellow men; in this system Eolus, the god of the
winds, became a skilful mariner who could foretell atmospheric changes;
Atlas, supporting the sky and earth on his wide shoulders, had been
formerly a great astronomer; Jupiter, a ruler of Crete; Hercules, a
knight-errant. Although these ancient writers interpreted the fables
in so many different ways, they all agreed in denying that an atom of
truth is found in these stories concerning the gods, and they insisted
that no myth must be taken _au pied de la lettre_. At a later period
it was thought that reminiscences of a barbaric age could be found in
which the ancestors of the Greeks apparently occupied themselves by
stealing, killing, deceiving, and eating their offspring. “Lactantius,
St Augustine, and the first missionaries, in their attacks on the
religious belief of the Greeks, and Romans availed themselves of
these arguments of Euhemerus, and taunted them with worshipping gods
that were no gods, but known and admitted to have been merely deified
mortals.”[48] In later times the same theory was revived; certain
theologians, rather lacking in penetration, looked to Greek mythology
for traces of sacred personages, they imagined that they could
recognise in Saturn and his three sons, Jupiter, Neptune, and Pluto,
the features of Noah and his sons, Ham, Japhet, and Shem; and in a
recently published book the author suggests that when Hesiod describes
the garden of the Hesperides, we have a tradition of the garden of Eden.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account